mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Bing Huang <huangbing@kylinos.cn>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, brauner@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sche/fair: static cpumasks for load balance
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 19:04:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220525170434.GK2578@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523094216.1746504-1-huangbing@kylinos.cn>

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 05:42:16PM +0800, Bing Huang wrote:
> The both cpu mask load_balance_mask and select_idle_mask just only used
> in fair.c, but allocation in core.c in CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y case,
> and global via declare per cpu variations. More or less, it looks wired.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bing Huang <huangbing@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c  | 13 +++----------
>  kernel/sched/fair.c  | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/sched/sched.h |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index d58c0389eb23..64934c5e236d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -9448,9 +9448,6 @@ LIST_HEAD(task_groups);
>  static struct kmem_cache *task_group_cache __read_mostly;
>  #endif
>  
> -DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
> -DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_idle_mask);
> -
>  void __init sched_init(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long ptr = 0;
> @@ -9494,14 +9491,10 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
>  	}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> -		per_cpu(load_balance_mask, i) = (cpumask_var_t)kzalloc_node(
> -			cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
> -		per_cpu(select_idle_mask, i) = (cpumask_var_t)kzalloc_node(
> -			cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
> -	}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK */
> +	init_working_cpumask();
> +#endif

We already have init_sched_fair_class(), can't you use that?

>  
>  	init_rt_bandwidth(&def_rt_bandwidth, global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index a68482d66535..3a4b0dd1beb5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5831,8 +5831,8 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  
>  /* Working cpumask for: load_balance, load_balance_newidle. */
> -DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
> -DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_idle_mask);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, select_idle_mask);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
>  
> @@ -7052,6 +7052,20 @@ balance_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> +void __init init_working_cpumask(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		per_cpu(load_balance_mask, i) = (cpumask_var_t)kzalloc_node(
> +				cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
> +		per_cpu(select_idle_mask, i) = (cpumask_var_t)kzalloc_node(
> +				cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
> +	}
> +}
> +#endif

If you stick that #ifdef inside the function, you can remove it
everwhere else. Less #ifdef is more better.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-25 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-23  9:42 Bing Huang
2022-05-25 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-05-26  8:32   ` huangbing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220525170434.GK2578@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=huangbing@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®