From: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: x86/mmu: Set memory encryption "value", not "mask", in shadow PDPTRs
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:20:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220608012015.19566-1-yuan.yao@intel.com> (raw)
Assign shadow_me_value, not shadow_me_mask, to PAE root entries,
a.k.a. shadow PDPTRs, when host memory encryption is supported. The
"mask" is the set of all possible memory encryption bits, e.g. MKTME
KeyIDs, whereas "value" holds the actual value that needs to be
stuffed into host page tables.
Using shadow_me_mask results in a failed VM-Entry due to setting
reserved PA bits in the PDPTRs, and ultimately causes an OOPS due to
physical addresses with non-zero MKTME bits sending to_shadow_page()
into the weeds:
set kvm_intel.dump_invalid_vmcs=1 to dump internal KVM state.
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffd43f00063049e8
PGD 86dfd8067 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
RIP: 0010:mmu_free_root_page+0x3c/0x90 [kvm]
kvm_mmu_free_roots+0xd1/0x200 [kvm]
__kvm_mmu_unload+0x29/0x70 [kvm]
kvm_mmu_unload+0x13/0x20 [kvm]
kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x8a/0x190 [kvm]
kvm_put_kvm+0x197/0x2d0 [kvm]
kvm_vm_release+0x21/0x30 [kvm]
__fput+0x8e/0x260
____fput+0xe/0x10
task_work_run+0x6f/0xb0
do_exit+0x327/0xa90
do_group_exit+0x35/0xa0
get_signal+0x911/0x930
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x37/0x720
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xb2/0x140
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x16/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Fixes: e54f1ff244ac ("KVM: x86/mmu: Add shadow_me_value and repurpose shadow_me_mask")
Signed-off-by: Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index efe5a3dca1e0..6bd144f1e60c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3411,7 +3411,7 @@ static int mmu_alloc_direct_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
root = mmu_alloc_root(vcpu, i << (30 - PAGE_SHIFT),
i << 30, PT32_ROOT_LEVEL, true);
mmu->pae_root[i] = root | PT_PRESENT_MASK |
- shadow_me_mask;
+ shadow_me_value;
}
mmu->root.hpa = __pa(mmu->pae_root);
} else {
--
2.27.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-06-08 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-08 1:20 Yuan Yao [this message]
2022-06-08 12:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-08 22:53 ` Yuan Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220608012015.19566-1-yuan.yao@intel.com \
--to=yuan.yao@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=yuan.yao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®