From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB82C433EF for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343920AbiFIPDz (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:03:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244302AbiFIPDt (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:03:49 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE6FB1912C5; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70FF5B82E08; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAE14C34114; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:03:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1654787026; bh=zckzmkd7x9TcLA6szScBpBDm6k+73RvLOocAbgUPcAY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a7W0E9G+xCZRWgN4UtTdhxqKa8G0Ba1/siJ6zWbNERHwp+Sl2J9TFAO++MN0OCR2K Y81dQYGEQ8JFZ8f09NyzIFCucLLWvrDFXGaYtLUAuFPXTLUhuEbXZHeZ3NEd5eBA3n jV4VZwah8XPvduppXUXY824LY1z9grpwuioCxpu/CQswTZaFU3XRmSnyH5cYc3z+4i QNc80Cv2/GI0Rp8A1iNuGGoibchA8KIQdTxNbKeFndqaIKkqo5pKgFwNDEYoLnkWqb v3KRzCMy9UrMbYEkETmqovNdOdoAxeKj29YTa/wbygfs/94sejr+E9x3oiNWKjHypD 9UnzGu+NwZpMQ== Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:03:39 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Alan Stern Cc: Akira Yokosawa , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Andrea Parri , Nicholas Piggin , David Howells , Daniel Lustig , Joel Fernandes , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -lkmm] docs/memory-barriers: Fix inconsistent name of 'data dependency barrier' Message-ID: <20220609150339.GA3289@willie-the-truck> References: <20220607133432.GA32701@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:34:08AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:34:33PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > Alternatively, maybe we should be removing the historical stuff from the > > document altogether if it's no longer needed. We don't have any occurrences > > of read_barrier_depends() anymore, so why confuse people with it? > > How about relegating discussion of these barriers to a special > "historical" or "niche architecture" section of the document? In a > separate patch, of course. That would work, perhaps with a little bit of commentary to say that it's no longer relevent to the kernel sources and is provided for information only. Will