From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55D5CCA47B for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 05:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346199AbiFJFiW (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 01:38:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47488 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243950AbiFJFiU (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 01:38:20 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7126D2584C2; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 22:38:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1654839499; x=1686375499; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Mm671fARQkehGag+uwU37hxKBr75xWcEw+/mL45ZIZ4=; b=nj8fJ9FHgGK5L6gQaJSgHpsiw2c5qhr+KB0zxXV3o31Lmp6rs3RQ4DkF j9R9i6bYHrqPIKjq8bQsdev2m9zCkU0TqWkl5SuMDE7gOAMyYJ6IPsCvl bOahgEi0oBkwSxGBloaNn5JD0ytkVvmw2Ll3fVjx/gg8iAngp5xbmomCw lu7FZImkEzbihDaHyBbyD+YzulE6vf0nEHU3+jeTwHkuYIN97plNGiYKl HnEzNqIU1ioPjtGADr7rOV2JH8LCD7M6Jw+NPOj1sDjSqHOLbPQmkZxim SeiBpkhPQhc9Ih/7EMGaH7FNQDEbTCxMEjuxNkzDJzy924SgdgAFrca6e g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10373"; a="341586257" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,288,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="341586257" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2022 22:38:18 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,288,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="637944682" Received: from xsang-optiplex-9020.sh.intel.com (HELO xsang-OptiPlex-9020) ([10.239.159.143]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jun 2022 22:38:16 -0700 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 13:38:07 +0800 From: Oliver Sang To: Dave Chinner Cc: Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , "Darrick J. Wong" , LKML , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com Subject: Re: [xfs] 1eb70f54c4: xfstests.xfs.348.fail Message-ID: <20220610053807.GA9136@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> References: <20220602090409.GD27190@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <20220602214436.GF1098723@dread.disaster.area> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220602214436.GF1098723@dread.disaster.area> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 07:44:36AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > ... > > (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/348.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/348.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > > xfs/349 [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/349.out.bad) > > --- tests/xfs/349.out 2022-05-16 16:42:32.000000000 +0000 > > +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/349.out.bad 2022-05-18 11:53:51.101272360 +0000 > > @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@ > > QA output created by 349 > > Format and populate > > -Scrub > > ... > > (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/xfs/349.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//xfs/349.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > > You are running a test in the "dangerous_fuzzers" group that isn't > in the auto group. This is a test for developers to find error > detection issues and, as such, failure is kinda expected. It is not > regression test that can be used for pass/fail testing.... Thanks a lot for guidance! we will disable auto tests in "dangerous_fuzzers" group. > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com