From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: disable notification hardening by default
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:36:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220617083420-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220617072626.30503-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 03:26:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We try to harden virtio device notifications in 8b4ec69d7e09 ("virtio:
> harden vring IRQ"). It works with the assumption that the driver or
> core can properly call virtio_device_ready() at the right
> place. Unfortunately, this seems to be not true and uncover various
> bugs of the existing drivers, mainly the issue of using
> virtio_device_ready() incorrectly.
>
> So let's having a Kconfig option and disable it by default. It gives
> us a breath to fix the drivers and then we can consider to enable it
> by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
> drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 2 ++
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> include/linux/virtio_config.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> index b5adf6abd241..b059c39af3d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ menuconfig VIRTIO_MENU
>
> if VIRTIO_MENU
>
> +config VIRTIO_HARDEN_NOTIFICATION
> + bool "Harden virtio notification"
> + help
> + Enable to this
Enable this
> to harden the
handling of
> device notifications and
> + supress the ones that are illegal.
Experimental: not all drivers handle this correctly at this point.
If unsure, say N.
> +
> config VIRTIO_PCI
> tristate "PCI driver for virtio devices"
> depends on PCI
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> index ef04a96942bf..21dc08d2f32d 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> * */
> void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRTIO_HARDEN_NOTIFICATION
> /*
> * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> * interrupt for this line arriving after
> @@ -228,6 +229,7 @@ void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> */
> virtio_break_device(dev);
> virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> +#endif
>
> dev->config->reset(dev);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 13a7348cedff..d9d3b6e201fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1688,7 +1688,11 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> vq->we_own_ring = true;
> vq->notify = notify;
> vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRTIO_HARDEN_NOTIFICATION
> vq->broken = true;
> +#else
> + vq->broken = false;
> +#endif
> vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> vq->event_triggered = false;
> vq->num_added = 0;
> @@ -2135,9 +2139,13 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> }
>
> if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRTIO_HARDEN_NOTIFICATION
> dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> return IRQ_NONE;
> +#else
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +#endif
> }
>
> /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> @@ -2180,7 +2188,11 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> vq->we_own_ring = false;
> vq->notify = notify;
> vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRTIO_HARDEN_NOTIFICATION
> vq->broken = true;
> +#else
> + vq->broken = false;
> +#endif
> vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> vq->event_triggered = false;
> vq->num_added = 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> index 9a36051ceb76..d15c3cdda2d2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
>
> WARN_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRTIO_HARDEN_NOTIFICATION
> /*
> * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> @@ -264,6 +265,7 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> */
> virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> +#endif
> /*
> * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> --
> 2.25.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-17 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-17 7:26 Jason Wang
2022-06-17 10:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-17 11:47 ` Jason Wang
2022-06-17 12:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-17 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220617083420-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome