From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 2/7] rcu/nocb: Invert rcu_state.barrier_mutex VS hotplug lock locking order
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:44:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220620224503.3841196-2-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220620224455.GA3840881@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
From: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
In case of failure to spawn either rcuog or rcuo[p] kthreads for a given
rdp, rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload() needs to be called with the hotplug
lock and the barrier_mutex held. However cpus write lock is already held
while calling rcutree_prepare_cpu(). It's not possible to call
rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload() from there with just locking the barrier_mutex
or this would result in a locking inversion against
rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload() which holds both locks in the reverse order.
Simply solve this with inverting the locking order inside
rcu_nocb_cpu_[de]offload(). This will be a pre-requisite to toggle NOCB
states toward cpusets anyway.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index dac74952e1d1b..f2f2cab6285a1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1055,8 +1055,8 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
cpus_read_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
ret = work_on_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload, rdp);
@@ -1067,8 +1067,8 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
ret = -EINVAL;
}
}
- cpus_read_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
+ cpus_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -1134,8 +1134,8 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_offload(int cpu)
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
cpus_read_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
ret = work_on_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_rdp_offload, rdp);
@@ -1146,8 +1146,8 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_offload(int cpu)
ret = -EINVAL;
}
}
- cpus_read_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
+ cpus_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-20 22:44 [PATCH rcu 0/7] Callback-offload (nocb) updates for v5.20 Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-20 22:44 ` [PATCH rcu 1/7] rcu/nocb: Add/del rdp to iterate from rcuog itself Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19 9:27 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-06-20 22:44 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2022-07-19 9:28 ` [PATCH rcu 2/7] rcu/nocb: Invert rcu_state.barrier_mutex VS hotplug lock locking order Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-06-20 22:44 ` [PATCH rcu 3/7] rcu/nocb: Fix NOCB kthreads spawn failure with rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload() direct call Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19 9:28 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-06-20 22:45 ` [PATCH rcu 4/7] rcu/nocb: Add an option to offload all CPUs on boot Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19 9:34 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-07-19 18:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19 22:42 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-07-19 22:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19 22:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-06-20 22:45 ` [PATCH rcu 5/7] rcu: Add nocb_cb_kthread check to rcu_is_callbacks_kthread() Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19 9:35 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-06-20 22:45 ` [PATCH rcu 6/7] rcu/nocb: Add option to opt rcuo kthreads out of RT priority Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19 9:35 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-06-20 22:45 ` [PATCH rcu 7/7] rcu/nocb: Avoid polling when my_rdp->nocb_head_rdp list is empty Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19 9:36 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220620224503.3841196-2-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=uladzislau.rezki@sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®