From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
dev@openvswitch.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ensure all external references are released in deferred skbuffs
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:28:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220622102813.GA24844@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iL_EmkEgPAVdhNW4tyzwQbARyji93mUQ9E2MRczWpNm7g@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 2:39 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org> wrote:
> >
> > Open vSwitch system test suite is broken due to inability to
> > load/unload netfilter modules. kworker thread is getting trapped
> > in the infinite loop while running a net cleanup inside the
> > nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list, because deferred skbuffs are still
> > holding nfct references and not being freed by their CPU cores.
> >
> > In general, the idea that we will have an rx interrupt on every
> > CPU core at some point in a near future doesn't seem correct.
> > Devices are getting created and destroyed, interrupts are getting
> > re-scheduled, CPUs are going online and offline dynamically.
> > Any of these events may leave packets stuck in defer list for a
> > long time. It might be OK, if they are just a piece of memory,
> > but we can't afford them holding references to any other resources.
> >
> > In case of OVS, nfct reference keeps the kernel thread in busy loop
> > while holding a 'pernet_ops_rwsem' semaphore. That blocks the
> > later modprobe request from user space:
> >
> > # ps
> > 299 root R 99.3 200:25.89 kworker/u96:4+
> >
> > # journalctl
> > INFO: task modprobe:11787 blocked for more than 1228 seconds.
> > Not tainted 5.19.0-rc2 #8
> > task:modprobe state:D
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > __schedule+0x8aa/0x21d0
> > schedule+0xcc/0x200
> > rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x8e4/0x1580
> > down_write+0xfc/0x140
> > register_pernet_subsys+0x15/0x40
> > nf_nat_init+0xb6/0x1000 [nf_nat]
> > do_one_initcall+0xbb/0x410
> > do_init_module+0x1b4/0x640
> > load_module+0x4c1b/0x58d0
> > __do_sys_init_module+0x1d7/0x220
> > do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
> >
> > At this point OVS testsuite is unresponsive and never recover,
> > because these skbuffs are never freed.
> >
> > Solution is to make sure no external references attached to skb
> > before pushing it to the defer list. Using skb_release_head_state()
> > for that purpose. The function modified to be re-enterable, as it
> > will be called again during the defer list flush.
> >
> > Another approach that can fix the OVS use-case, is to kick all
> > cores while waiting for references to be released during the net
> > cleanup. But that sounds more like a workaround for a current
> > issue rather than a proper solution and will not cover possible
> > issues in other parts of the code.
> >
> > Additionally checking for skb_zcopy() while deferring. This might
> > not be necessary, as I'm not sure if we can actually have zero copy
> > packets on this path, but seems worth having for completeness as we
> > should never defer such packets regardless.
> >
> > CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > Fixes: 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to per-cpu lists")
> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
> > ---
> > net/core/skbuff.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> I do not think this patch is doing the right thing.
>
> Packets sitting in TCP receive queues should not hold state that is
> not relevant for TCP recvmsg().
Agree, but tcp_v4/6_rcv() already call nf_reset_ct(), else it would
not be possible to remove nf_conntrack module in practice.
I wonder where the deferred skbs are coming from, any and all
queued skbs need the conntrack state dropped.
I don't mind a new helper that does a combined dst+ct release though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-19 0:39 Ilya Maximets
2022-06-22 10:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 10:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 10:28 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2022-06-22 10:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 11:32 ` Ilya Maximets
2022-06-22 11:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 14:26 ` Ilya Maximets
2022-06-22 14:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 18:09 ` Ilya Maximets
2022-06-22 16:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 16:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 17:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 18:19 ` Ilya Maximets
2022-06-22 19:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 19:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-22 21:12 ` Ilya Maximets
2023-09-22 13:26 ` Ilya Maximets
2023-09-22 19:07 ` Ilya Maximets
2023-09-22 21:09 ` Ilya Maximets
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220622102813.GA24844@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®