From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7C9C433EF for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356444AbiFVLog (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 07:44:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55672 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1356969AbiFVLo0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 07:44:26 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CA33C49B; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05CA13D5; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.36.82]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EE583F66F; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:43:10 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Andy Shevchenko , Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: ACPI: Update links and references to DSD related docs Message-ID: <20220622114310.r3vick2ex2kx4eiq@bogus> References: <20220621150436.3303431-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:41:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:12 PM Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > The existing references to DSD are stale and outdated. The new process > > and guidance is maintained @https://github.com/UEFI/DSD-Guide > > > > Update the existing documents to reflect the same. > > Hmm... On one hand I like the change, on the other the mentioned > repository doesn't look like it is officially supported by ASWG (or > did I misread something?). If I'm not mistaken, then I would rather > see both mentioned. Otherwise it looks good, thanks! > Sorry I must have mentioned that, I know and also I am told there was a request made to ASWG to remove the outdated links. Hopefully it will be removed soon. -- Regards, Sudeep