From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Add optimized helper to retrieve an SPTE's index
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 21:30:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220624213039.2872507-2-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624213039.2872507-1-seanjc@google.com>
Add spte_index() to dedup all the code that calculates a SPTE's index
into its parent's page table and/or spt array. Opportunistically tweak
the calculation to avoid pointer arithmetic, which is subtle (subtract in
8-byte chunks) and less performant (requires the compiler to generate the
subtraction).
Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index bd74a287b54a..b04e9ce2469a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
sp = sptep_to_sp(spte);
- gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, spte - sp->spt);
+ gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, spte_index(spte));
/*
* Unlike rmap_add, rmap_remove does not run in the context of a vCPU
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ static void __rmap_add(struct kvm *kvm,
int rmap_count;
sp = sptep_to_sp(spte);
- kvm_mmu_page_set_translation(sp, spte - sp->spt, gfn, access);
+ kvm_mmu_page_set_translation(sp, spte_index(spte), gfn, access);
kvm_update_page_stats(kvm, sp->role.level, 1);
rmap_head = gfn_to_rmap(gfn, sp->role.level, slot);
@@ -1714,11 +1714,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
static void mark_unsync(u64 *spte)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
- unsigned int index;
sp = sptep_to_sp(spte);
- index = spte - sp->spt;
- if (__test_and_set_bit(index, sp->unsync_child_bitmap))
+ if (__test_and_set_bit(spte_index(spte), sp->unsync_child_bitmap))
return;
if (sp->unsync_children++)
return;
@@ -2201,7 +2199,7 @@ static union kvm_mmu_page_role kvm_mmu_child_role(u64 *sptep, bool direct, unsig
*/
if (role.has_4_byte_gpte) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(role.level != PG_LEVEL_4K);
- role.quadrant = (sptep - parent_sp->spt) % 2;
+ role.quadrant = spte_index(sptep) & 1;
}
return role;
@@ -2826,7 +2824,7 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
rmap_add(vcpu, slot, sptep, gfn, pte_access);
} else {
/* Already rmapped but the pte_access bits may have changed. */
- kvm_mmu_page_set_access(sp, sptep - sp->spt, pte_access);
+ kvm_mmu_page_set_access(sp, spte_index(sptep), pte_access);
}
return ret;
@@ -2842,7 +2840,7 @@ static int direct_pte_prefetch_many(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
int i, ret;
gfn_t gfn;
- gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, start - sp->spt);
+ gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, spte_index(start));
slot = gfn_to_memslot_dirty_bitmap(vcpu, gfn, access & ACC_WRITE_MASK);
if (!slot)
return -1;
@@ -2868,7 +2866,7 @@ static void __direct_pte_prefetch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
WARN_ON(!sp->role.direct);
- i = (sptep - sp->spt) & ~(PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
+ i = spte_index(sptep) & ~(PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
spte = sp->spt + i;
for (i = 0; i < PTE_PREFETCH_NUM; i++, spte++) {
@@ -6146,8 +6144,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *shadow_mmu_get_sp_for_split(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *hu
unsigned int access;
gfn_t gfn;
- gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(huge_sp, huge_sptep - huge_sp->spt);
- access = kvm_mmu_page_get_access(huge_sp, huge_sptep - huge_sp->spt);
+ gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(huge_sp, spte_index(huge_sptep));
+ access = kvm_mmu_page_get_access(huge_sp, spte_index(huge_sptep));
/*
* Note, huge page splitting always uses direct shadow pages, regardless
@@ -6221,7 +6219,7 @@ static int shadow_mmu_try_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm,
u64 spte;
/* Grab information for the tracepoint before dropping the MMU lock. */
- gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(huge_sp, huge_sptep - huge_sp->spt);
+ gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(huge_sp, spte_index(huge_sptep));
level = huge_sp->role.level;
spte = *huge_sptep;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 2448fa8d8438..d06dee7d38a8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static void FNAME(pte_prefetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct guest_walker *gw,
if (sp->role.direct)
return __direct_pte_prefetch(vcpu, sp, sptep);
- i = (sptep - sp->spt) & ~(PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
+ i = spte_index(sptep) & ~(PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
spte = sp->spt + i;
for (i = 0; i < PTE_PREFETCH_NUM; i++, spte++) {
@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, hpa_t root_hpa)
break;
pte_gpa = FNAME(get_level1_sp_gpa)(sp);
- pte_gpa += (sptep - sp->spt) * sizeof(pt_element_t);
+ pte_gpa += spte_index(sptep) * sizeof(pt_element_t);
mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, sp, sptep, NULL);
if (is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index b5c855f5514f..ba3dccb202bc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -190,6 +190,12 @@ static inline bool is_removed_spte(u64 spte)
return spte == REMOVED_SPTE;
}
+/* Get an SPTE's index into its parent's page table (and the spt array). */
+static inline int spte_index(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ return ((unsigned long)sptep / sizeof(*sptep)) & (SPTE_ENT_PER_PAGE - 1);
+}
+
/*
* In some cases, we need to preserve the GFN of a non-present or reserved
* SPTE when we usurp the upper five bits of the physical address space to
--
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 21:30 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Cleanups for eager page splitting Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 21:30 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-06-24 23:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Add optimized helper to retrieve an SPTE's index David Matlack
2022-06-24 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Expand quadrant comment for PG_LEVEL_4K shadow pages Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 23:43 ` David Matlack
2022-06-24 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use "unsigned int", not "u32", for SPTEs' @access info Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Buffer nested MMU split_desc_cache only by default capacity Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220624213039.2872507-2-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®