From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: lizhe.67@bytedance.com
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lizefan.x@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] vfio: remove useless judgement
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 21:13:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220625001304.GI23621@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220623115603.22288-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 07:56:03PM +0800, lizhe.67@bytedance.com wrote:
> From: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
>
> In function vfio_dma_do_unmap(), we currently prevent process to unmap
> vfio dma region whose mm_struct is different from the vfio_dma->task.
> In our virtual machine scenario which is using kvm and qemu, this
> judgement stops us from liveupgrading our qemu, which uses fork() &&
> exec() to load the new binary but the new process cannot do the
> VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA action during vm exit because of this judgement.
>
> This judgement is added in commit 8f0d5bb95f76 ("vfio iommu type1: Add
> task structure to vfio_dma") for the security reason. But it seems that
> no other task who has no family relationship with old and new process
> can get the same vfio_dma struct here for the reason of resource
> isolation. So this patch delete it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
I'm inclined to agree with this reasoning and deliberately did not
include a similar check in iommufd. Any process with access to the
container FD should be able to manipulate the IOVA space.
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-25 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-23 11:56 lizhe.67
2022-06-25 0:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220625001304.GI23621@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®