From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACC5C43334 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234403AbiF0LG2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 07:06:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60220 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233832AbiF0LGZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 07:06:25 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5409646A; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 04:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2982057B; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:06:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KPTQuNyaiw8o; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:06:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailout2.secunet.com (mailout2.secunet.com [62.96.220.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1C820270; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:06:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout2.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116ED80004A; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:06:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:06:19 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:06:19 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C7593182CC2; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:06:19 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Zhengchao Shao CC: , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: change the type of xfrm_register_km and xfrm_unregister_km Message-ID: <20220627110619.GC2950045@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20220615015519.96975-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220615015519.96975-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:55:19AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote: > Functions xfrm_register_km and xfrm_unregister_km do always return 0, > change the type of functions to void. > > Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao Applied, thanks Zhengchao!