[PATCH net-next] net: mptcp: fix some spelling mistake in mptcp

[menglong8.dong@gmail.com]

From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>

codespell finds some spelling mistake in mptcp:

net/mptcp/subflow.c:1624: interaces ==> interfaces
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1130: regarless ==> regardless

Just fix them.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 2 +-
 net/mptcp/subflow.c    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index e099f2a12504..3de83e2a2611 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ss
 			}
 			unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
 
-			/* always try to push the pending data regarless of re-injections:
+			/* always try to push the pending data regardless of re-injections:
 			 * we can possibly use backup subflows now, and subflow selection
 			 * is cheap under the msk socket lock
 			 */
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 654cc602ff2c..8c3e699d3387 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, struct socket **new_sock)
 	/* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master
 	 * socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed
 	 * by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the
-	 * procfs/diag interaces really show this one belonging to the correct
+	 * procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct
 	 * user.
 	 */
 	SOCK_INODE(sf)->i_ino = SOCK_INODE(sk->sk_socket)->i_ino;
-- 
2.36.1