mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: [PATCHSET 0/6] perf lock: Add contention subcommand (v1)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 21:36:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220721043644.153718-1-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)

Hello,

It's to add a new subcommand 'contention' (shortly 'con') to perf lock.

The new subcommand is to handle the new lock:contention_{begin,end}
tracepoints and shows lock type and caller address like below:

  $ perf lock contention
   contended   total wait     max wait     avg wait         type   caller

         238      1.41 ms     29.20 us      5.94 us     spinlock   update_blocked_averages+0x4c
           1    902.08 us    902.08 us    902.08 us      rwsem:R   do_user_addr_fault+0x1dd
          81    330.30 us     17.24 us      4.08 us     spinlock   _nohz_idle_balance+0x172
           2     89.54 us     61.26 us     44.77 us     spinlock   do_anonymous_page+0x16d
          24     78.36 us     12.27 us      3.27 us        mutex   pipe_read+0x56
           2     71.58 us     59.56 us     35.79 us     spinlock   __handle_mm_fault+0x6aa
           6     25.68 us      6.89 us      4.28 us     spinlock   do_idle+0x28d
           1     18.46 us     18.46 us     18.46 us      rtmutex   exec_fw_cmd+0x21b
           3     15.25 us      6.26 us      5.08 us     spinlock   tick_do_update_jiffies64+0x2c
   ...

where rwsem:R stands for read access (down_read) for a rw-semaphore.
Other types of lock access is obvious and it doesn't detect optimistic
spinning on mutex yet.  This is just a base work for lock contention
analysis and more will come later.

You can get this from 'perf/lock-subcmd-v1' branch on

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git

Thanks,
Namhyung


Namhyung Kim (6):
  perf lock: Fix a copy-n-paste bug
  perf lock: Add flags field in the lock_stat
  perf lock: Add lock aggregation enum
  perf lock: Add 'contention' subcommand
  perf lock: Add -k and -F options to 'contention' subcommand
  perf lock: Support -t option for 'contention' subcommand

 tools/perf/Documentation/perf-lock.txt |  23 +-
 tools/perf/builtin-lock.c              | 403 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)


base-commit: 41d0914d861e82b4eeec16dd0f6109c311cf4c7e
-- 
2.37.0.170.g444d1eabd0-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-21  4:36 Namhyung Kim [this message]
2022-07-21  4:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf lock: Fix a copy-n-paste bug Namhyung Kim
2022-07-21 19:09   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-21  4:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf lock: Add flags field in the lock_stat Namhyung Kim
2022-07-21  4:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf lock: Add lock aggregation enum Namhyung Kim
2022-07-21 19:02   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-21 19:05     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-25 16:56       ` Namhyung Kim
2022-07-21  4:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf lock: Add 'contention' subcommand Namhyung Kim
2022-07-21  4:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf lock: Add -k and -F options to " Namhyung Kim
2022-07-21  4:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf lock: Support -t option for " Namhyung Kim
2022-08-03  9:51 ` [PATCHSET 0/6] perf lock: Add contention subcommand (v1) Ingo Molnar
2022-08-04  4:55   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-08-04  8:37     ` Ingo Molnar
2022-08-04 21:02       ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220721043644.153718-1-namhyung@kernel.org \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®