From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binder: fix UAF of ref->proc caused by race condition
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:13:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220802081320.kbrnqnzlectmcb3y@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220801182511.3371447-1-cmllamas@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 06:25:11PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> A transaction of type BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE can fail to increment the
> reference for a node. In this case, the target proc normally releases
> the failed reference upon close as expected. However, if the target is
> dying in parallel the call will race with binder_deferred_release(), so
> the target could have released all of its references by now leaving the
> cleanup of the new failed reference unhandled.
>
> The transaction then ends and the target proc gets released making the
> ref->proc now a dangling pointer. Later on, ref->node is closed and we
> attempt to take spin_lock(&ref->proc->inner_lock), which leads to the
> use-after-free bug reported below. Let's fix this by cleaning up the
> failed reference on the spot instead of relying on the target to do so.
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150
> Write of size 4 at addr ffff5ca207094238 by task kworker/1:0/590
>
> CPU: 1 PID: 590 Comm: kworker/1:0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8 #10
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> Workqueue: events binder_deferred_func
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace.part.0+0x1d0/0x1e0
> show_stack+0x18/0x70
> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
> print_report+0x2e4/0x61c
> kasan_report+0xa4/0x110
> kasan_check_range+0xfc/0x1a4
> __kasan_check_write+0x3c/0x50
> _raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0x150
> binder_deferred_func+0x5e0/0x9b0
> process_one_work+0x38c/0x5f0
> worker_thread+0x9c/0x694
> kthread+0x188/0x190
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
> ---
Seems sane,
Acked-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-01 18:25 Carlos Llamas
2022-08-02 8:13 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-08-02 19:40 ` Carlos Llamas
2022-08-03 7:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-17 22:04 ` Carlos Llamas
2022-08-18 5:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-08-18 15:48 ` Carlos Llamas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220802081320.kbrnqnzlectmcb3y@wittgenstein \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®