From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D8CC19F2A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 13:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234353AbiHGNr4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2022 09:47:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52540 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234322AbiHGNry (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2022 09:47:54 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30925A458 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 06:47:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1659880073; x=1691416073; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=77FBl3vUx49zjQlv3n6/4RN63oc5IH0eL4s0Jvvhj8Y=; b=hPGi83YuDz4lllnDqBEPKP0sbdjtggGaXBtEBd/EvOxWIlmU4zS647BA 7aeQVaRxzZ8XK12/A1sUSpOR5+eU7WF++BUZj0jDuYMQiwW3zeYC6oyJf WmF8LlmEk2+kXJp9i+VD7P1NqtF6e4auwtBNMFl0/rbMsZRUiF6IlL+jI +xr81YEWDbxZNLTgJBiRHriq8IeBKuJQ0dOEsraScHg9LPKM5O9uGoKb6 6L6KXugvdS0D404qGy5ppTvebwmzQ/A+ZKx247yLXXReq6dT5EzzSTOYn XM0/iFXsO9mx6BG6rsG6/yDdMOqkzSNsziZU01RauuktgiWZ3dKUF1+aD g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10432"; a="354438638" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,220,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="354438638" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2022 06:47:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,220,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="554620105" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO e0eace57cfef) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2022 06:47:33 -0700 Received: from kbuild by e0eace57cfef with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oKgcv-000LKn-0b; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 13:47:33 +0000 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 21:47:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Qi Zheng , will@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: run softirqs on the per-CPU IRQ stack Message-ID: <202208072125.pTMPctXF-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220802065325.39740-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220802065325.39740-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Qi, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next] [also build test WARNING on v5.19] [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core linus/master next-20220805] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Qi-Zheng/arm64-run-softirqs-on-the-per-CPU-IRQ-stack/20220802-145547 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next config: arm64-randconfig-r032-20220801 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220807/202208072125.pTMPctXF-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 52cd00cabf479aa7eb6dbb063b7ba41ea57bce9e) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/34ac9375ce5e75127084159f724fcb2208c022a3 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Qi-Zheng/arm64-run-softirqs-on-the-per-CPU-IRQ-stack/20220802-145547 git checkout 34ac9375ce5e75127084159f724fcb2208c022a3 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash arch/arm64/kernel/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:81:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'do_softirq_own_stack' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void do_softirq_own_stack(void) ^ arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:81:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void do_softirq_own_stack(void) ^ static arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:120:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'init_IRQ' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __init init_IRQ(void) ^ arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:120:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __init init_IRQ(void) ^ static 2 warnings generated. vim +/do_softirq_own_stack +81 arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c 80 > 81 void do_softirq_own_stack(void) 82 { 83 call_on_irq_stack(NULL, ____do_softirq); 84 } 85 #endif 86 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp