From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "LKML Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Making microcode loading more robust
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:37:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220816043754.3258815-1-ashok.raj@intel.com> (raw)
Hi Boris,
Here is an update that handles siblings in NMI loop.
Changes since v1:
Patch 1,2,3: No Change.
Patch 4:
- Move from lazy NMI handling to sending siblings in NMI early. This makes
things more robust, since there might be something we could trip over
before the handler is called that might be patched by the update.
[ Suggested by Andy Cooper ]
TBD: Handle DR7, temporarily disable until the update is done
[ Suggested by Andy Lutomirsky ]
Ashok Raj (4):
x86/microcode/intel: Check against CPU signature before saving
microcode
x86/microcode/intel: Allow a late-load only if a min rev is specified
x86/microcode: Avoid any chance of MCE's during microcode update
x86/microcode: Place siblings in NMI loop while update in progress
arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 4 +
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h | 4 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 9 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 34 ++++-
5 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-16 4:37 Ashok Raj [this message]
2022-08-16 4:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/microcode/intel: Check against CPU signature before saving microcode Ashok Raj
2022-08-16 4:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/microcode/intel: Allow a late-load only if a min rev is specified Ashok Raj
2022-08-16 4:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/microcode: Avoid any chance of MCE's during microcode update Ashok Raj
2022-08-16 4:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/microcode: Handle NMI's " Ashok Raj
2022-08-16 4:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/microcode: Place siblings in NMI loop while update in progress Ashok Raj
2022-08-23 16:11 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220816043754.3258815-1-ashok.raj@intel.com \
--to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®