From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Alexey Klimov <aklimov@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, klimov.linux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH REVIEW 2/2] watchdog: add wd_data->lock mutex locking to watchdog_open()
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:57:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220818165743.GB923105@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220818020624.2386475-2-aklimov@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:06:24AM +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> watchdog_open() does not have wd_data->lock locks at all unlike
> the watchdog_release() for instance. Also watchdog_open() calls
> watchdog_start() that should be called with wd_data->lock acquired.
> The mutex lock should be acquired in the beginning of the function
> after getting struct watchdog_core_data wd_data pointer to deal with
> different status fields and be able to call watchdog_start(); and
> released on exit and on different error paths.
>
Again, I am missing which problem you are fixing here. You are making
a claim that a lock is needed, but you do not explain _why_ this is really
needed, why test_and_set_bit() is insufficient, and what problem is solved
that has been observed with the current code.
Guenter
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <aklimov@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> index 804236a094f6..d07a864036d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static int watchdog_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> struct watchdog_core_data *wd_data;
> struct watchdog_device *wdd;
> bool hw_running;
> - int err;
> + int err = -EBUSY;
>
> /* Get the corresponding watchdog device */
> if (imajor(inode) == MISC_MAJOR)
> @@ -845,9 +845,10 @@ static int watchdog_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> wd_data = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct watchdog_core_data,
> cdev);
>
> + mutex_lock(&wd_data->lock);
> /* the watchdog is single open! */
> if (test_and_set_bit(_WDOG_DEV_OPEN, &wd_data->status))
> - return -EBUSY;
> + goto out_unlock;
>
> wdd = wd_data->wdd;
>
> @@ -856,10 +857,8 @@ static int watchdog_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> * to be unloaded.
> */
> hw_running = watchdog_hw_running(wdd);
> - if (!hw_running && !try_module_get(wdd->ops->owner)) {
> - err = -EBUSY;
> + if (!hw_running && !try_module_get(wdd->ops->owner))
> goto out_clear;
> - }
>
> err = watchdog_start(wdd);
> if (err < 0)
> @@ -878,6 +877,7 @@ static int watchdog_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> * applied.
> */
> wd_data->open_deadline = KTIME_MAX;
> + mutex_unlock(&wd_data->lock);
>
> /* dev/watchdog is a virtual (and thus non-seekable) filesystem */
> return stream_open(inode, file);
> @@ -886,6 +886,8 @@ static int watchdog_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> module_put(wd_data->wdd->ops->owner);
> out_clear:
> clear_bit(_WDOG_DEV_OPEN, &wd_data->status);
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&wd_data->lock);
> return err;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 2:06 [PATCH REVIEW 1/2] watchdog: extend the mutex-protected section in watchdog_cdev_unregister() Alexey Klimov
2022-08-18 2:06 ` [PATCH REVIEW 2/2] watchdog: add wd_data->lock mutex locking to watchdog_open() Alexey Klimov
2022-08-18 9:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-08-18 16:57 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2022-08-18 16:55 ` [PATCH REVIEW 1/2] watchdog: extend the mutex-protected section in watchdog_cdev_unregister() Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220818165743.GB923105@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=aklimov@redhat.com \
--cc=klimov.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®