From: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm, hwpoison: fix possible use-after-free in mf_dax_kill_procs()
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:17:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220819081732.GA622828@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6dff6aec-833c-a3db-1180-09e395f6265a@huawei.com>
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 03:32:27PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/8/19 13:23, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 09:00:14PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> After kill_procs(), tk will be freed without being removed from the to_kill
> >> list. In the next iteration, the freed list entry in the to_kill list will
> >> be accessed, thus leading to use-after-free issue.
> >
> > kill_procs() runs over the to_kill list and frees all listed items in each
> > iteration. So just after returning from unmap_and_kill(), to_kill->next and
> > to_kill->prev still point to the addresses of struct to_kill which was the
> > first or last item (already freed!). This is bad-manered, but
> > collect_procs_fsdax() in the next iteration calls list_add_tail() and
> > overwrites the dangling pointers with newly allocated item. So this problem
>
> list_add_tail will do WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, new) where prev is already freed!
> Or am I miss something?
No, you're right. Thank you for explanation.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-18 13:00 [PATCH 0/6] A few fixup patches for hugetlb Miaohe Lin
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm, hwpoison: fix page refcnt leaking in try_memory_failure_hugetlb() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:20 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm, hwpoison: fix page refcnt leaking in unpoison_memory() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:21 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm, hwpoison: fix extra put_page() in soft_offline_page() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:21 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm, hwpoison: fix possible use-after-free in mf_dax_kill_procs() Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:23 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-19 7:32 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 8:17 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) [this message]
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm, hwpoison: kill procs if unmap fails Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:24 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-19 7:37 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 8:18 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm, hwpoison: avoid trying to unpoison reserved page Miaohe Lin
2022-08-19 5:24 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-18 13:05 ` [PATCH 0/6] A few fixup patches for hugetlb Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220819081732.GA622828@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--to=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®