From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+ab17848fe269b573eb71@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Ayushman Dutta <ayudutta@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] seccomp: Release filter when copy_process() fails.
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:16:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202208221414.A0E13E7@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822204436.26631-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 01:44:36PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> Our syzbot instance reported memory leaks in do_seccomp() [0], similar
> to the report [1]. It shows that we miss freeing struct seccomp_filter
> and some objects included in it.
>
> We can reproduce the issue with the program below [2] which calls one
> seccomp() and two clone() syscalls.
>
> The first clone()d child exits earlier than its parent and sends a
> signal to kill it during the second clone(), more precisely before the
> fatal_signal_pending() test in copy_process(). When the parent receives
> the signal, it has to destroy the embryonic process and return -EINTR to
> user space. In the failure path, we have to call seccomp_filter_release()
> to decrement the filter's ref count.
>
> Initially, we called it in free_task() called from the failure path, but
> the commit 3a15fb6ed92c ("seccomp: release filter after task is fully
> dead") moved it to release_task() to notify user space as early as possible
> that the filter is no longer used.
>
> To keep the change, let's call seccomp_filter_release() in copy_process()
> and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() in free_task() for future debugging.
Thanks for tracking this down! I think I'd prefer to avoid changing the
semantics around the existing seccomp refcount lifetime, so what about
just moving copy_seccomp() below the last possible error path?
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 90c85b17bf69..e7f4e7f1e01e 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -2409,12 +2409,6 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
spin_lock(¤t->sighand->siglock);
- /*
- * Copy seccomp details explicitly here, in case they were changed
- * before holding sighand lock.
- */
- copy_seccomp(p);
-
rv_task_fork(p);
rseq_fork(p, clone_flags);
@@ -2431,6 +2425,14 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
goto bad_fork_cancel_cgroup;
}
+ /* No more failures paths after this point. */
+
+ /*
+ * Copy seccomp details explicitly here, in case they were changed
+ * before holding sighand lock.
+ */
+ copy_seccomp(p);
+
init_task_pid_links(p);
if (likely(p->pid)) {
ptrace_init_task(p, (clone_flags & CLONE_PTRACE) || trace);
Totally untested, but I think it would fix this?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 20:44 Kuniyuki Iwashima
2022-08-22 21:16 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-08-22 21:49 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2022-08-22 23:38 ` Kees Cook
2022-08-23 0:00 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2022-09-02 3:16 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-02 3:16 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202208221414.A0E13E7@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=ayudutta@amazon.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=syzbot+ab17848fe269b573eb71@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®