From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382FDC00140 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 05:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234163AbiHXFDD (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 01:03:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234825AbiHXFCv (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 01:02:51 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com (lelv0143.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.248]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95744455B; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 22:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 27O52XYs117508; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:02:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1661317353; bh=HlzWJtlp8TIG5ZdTWDd8MdkslCP8aR7eIBflDUADZac=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=jmpl6ryR+hgS3Asbmg6PhPxzbdrXGlNHd/u6JaZdoJbKOil16Cweuw12lKY7b2dpT 5OPU2wNjItnVV63AoTVUiJzbfk4EMsKPz27iMAZUtHB+cZGpXk5fogmLsDTlmVhrC3 rhSn7vWvCXSrLdvTraLRxxZHkfmIs/3oW4/7VWD4= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 27O52Xsd014653 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:02:33 -0500 Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.6; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:02:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.6 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:02:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 27O52XoN018123; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:02:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:02:33 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: Apurva Nandan , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linus Walleij , , , , , Hari Nagalla Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: ti: Add initial support for J784s4 SoC Message-ID: <20220824050233.u4457ldxiqtiia4p@nineteen> References: <20220819190054.31348-1-a-nandan@ti.com> <20220819190054.31348-4-a-nandan@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13:18-20220823, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > + main_gpio_intr: interrupt-controller@a00000 { > > + compatible = "ti,sci-intr"; > > + reg = <0x00 0x00a00000 0x00 0x800>; > > 0x0, not 0x00. Here and all other places. Krzysztof is this a convention we have started following strongly? The reason I ask is to be able to cleanup elsewhere in the dts as well.. So far, I have insisted on 0x00 usage. [...] -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D