mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rustam Subkhankulov <subkhankulov@ispras.ru>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rustam Subkhankulov <subkhankulov@ispras.ru>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>,
	ldv-project@linuxtesting.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] fs/inode.c: change the order of initialization in inode_init_always()
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 22:25:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220829192521.694631-1-subkhankulov@ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220829141517.bcjbdk5zb74mrhgu@wittgenstein>

If function security_inode_alloc() returns a nonzero value due to an
error (e.g. fail to allocate memory), then some of the fields, including
'i_private', will not be initialized.

After that, if the fs-specfic free_inode function is called in
i_callback(), the nonzero value of 'i_private' field can be interpreted
as initialized. As a result, this can cause dereferencing of random
value pointer (e.g. nilfs2).

In earlier versions, a similar situation could occur with the 'u' union
in 'inode' structure.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.

Signed-off-by: Rustam Subkhankulov <subkhankulov@ispras.ru>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
---
 fs/inode.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index ba1de23c13c1..a2892d85993d 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -192,8 +192,6 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode)
 	inode->i_wb_frn_history = 0;
 #endif
 
-	if (security_inode_alloc(inode))
-		goto out;
 	spin_lock_init(&inode->i_lock);
 	lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_lock, &sb->s_type->i_lock_key);
 
@@ -228,6 +226,10 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode)
 	inode->i_fsnotify_mask = 0;
 #endif
 	inode->i_flctx = NULL;
+
+	if (security_inode_alloc(inode))
+		goto out;
+
 	this_cpu_inc(nr_inodes);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-29 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-27 14:09 [PATCH] " Alexey Khoroshilov
2022-08-29 14:15 ` Christian Brauner
2022-08-29 19:25   ` Rustam Subkhankulov [this message]
2022-08-31 23:59     ` [PATCH v2] " Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220829192521.694631-1-subkhankulov@ispras.ru \
    --to=subkhankulov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=khoroshilov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=ldv-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®