From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A589ECAAD4 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229808AbiH3WCv (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:02:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52900 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231959AbiH3WCY (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 18:02:24 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4E290817 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:58:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661896719; x=1693432719; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0QchS3pToVSk2fYaF5BA3KmAYs9eoRF9CtFUbxdGHBw=; b=AX1+gRhejoK5ncibeDGERIInK75BDrT58U1rHdz7sfKij459BrcxGF+b MUuWo/YshSeHIfK72vg6QBHUholVK8OnWyDPxSgopF2mjfoQM43gxoHqk 4+7UwIeoM3COjtQI5s5fjCyQE5e8tg4uG4NdjmfBzZMXXkeQup9U+j6wt 8cG4z+Z/3WVYQG0BlnYHVR9UOb5QV3m9M1/7FqlEaWg3quJ4ms19yvlQL WPJzFNOArF7zNDSImBzqolVyqUt6B4cXwmBHFUT9OWERaxftrwHPQCVUx y5CFO6ByYMrcRa2NqUWz3iI6T2hrPB781TOQc7WsDpxNR+tCoa9iP73TE g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10455"; a="296093117" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,276,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="296093117" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Aug 2022 14:58:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,276,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="562819004" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 77b6d4e16fc5) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2022 14:58:34 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 77b6d4e16fc5 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oT9Fh-0000fG-1R; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:58:33 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:58:24 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: wuchi , paul@paul-moore.com, eparis@redhat.com Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: remove obvious unnecessary header files Message-ID: <202208310549.y7u0iX8g-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220830105001.68478-1-wuchi.zero@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220830105001.68478-1-wuchi.zero@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi wuchi, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-audit/next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.0-rc3 next-20220830] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/wuchi/audit-remove-obvious-unnecessary-header-files/20220830-185249 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/audit.git next config: arm-randconfig-r015-20220830 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220831/202208310549.y7u0iX8g-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/f693f8ef00782656e1a94129e11611d410914905 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review wuchi/audit-remove-obvious-unnecessary-header-files/20220830-185249 git checkout f693f8ef00782656e1a94129e11611d410914905 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/prefetch.h:15, from arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h:12, from include/linux/atomic.h:7, from include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h:5, from arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h:245, from include/linux/bitops.h:67, from include/linux/log2.h:12, from include/asm-generic/div64.h:55, from arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h:107, from include/linux/math.h:6, from include/linux/math64.h:6, from include/linux/time64.h:5, from include/linux/restart_block.h:10, from include/linux/thread_info.h:14, from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5, from ./arch/arm/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1, from include/linux/preempt.h:78, from include/linux/spinlock.h:55, from include/linux/wait.h:9, from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8, from include/linux/fs.h:6, from kernel/auditsc.c:36: kernel/auditsc.c: In function 'audit_seccomp': >> arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:90:47: error: implicit declaration of function 'task_stack_page'; did you mean 'task_stack_vm_area'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 90 | ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_START_SP + task_stack_page(p)) - 1) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:92:25: note: in expansion of macro 'task_pt_regs' 92 | #define KSTK_EIP(tsk) task_pt_regs(tsk)->ARM_pc | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/auditsc.c:2987:47: note: in expansion of macro 'KSTK_EIP' 2987 | in_compat_syscall(), KSTK_EIP(current), code); | ^~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +90 arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h ^1da177e4c3f41 include/asm-arm/processor.h Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 88 815d5ec86eb8d5 include/asm-arm/processor.h Al Viro 2006-01-12 89 #define task_pt_regs(p) \ 32d39a9355780b include/asm-arm/processor.h Al Viro 2006-01-12 @90 ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_START_SP + task_stack_page(p)) - 1) 815d5ec86eb8d5 include/asm-arm/processor.h Al Viro 2006-01-12 91 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp