From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85DBC54EE9 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 22:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230228AbiIFWZt (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:25:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48804 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229995AbiIFWZ2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:25:28 -0400 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 328586555A; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 15:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MMg183B0Vz4xXS; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 08:24:44 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1662503085; bh=XzxkPfNC6fB8WXGwV1VRT//s4Ab8i65AuSr+Ty5+ric=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nw6z3aS7Yr4mAsOzGeADQMMUe39Y6VgAWb7oHpRE8LeffCLV3KSX4G3Hbh0O3Tcbc p571PRJum+2SI2lc0hirknHNYjwfCnV6JMAyqjQZBzj45F3s50Chv8KRIMRPJwtTAP g2GSbOA4hEJLmvCc1yqBk3KiuKfLmklPZb5rG2SpP39N6KXF4C9XfWvGN0Y/lN918Q I/atlsZQD6jMFK0ZMX7kO/copjIxxp7n04OROLD45yAGRIOKd9HpnGbQ9HB61PhgKp 008RuZMhc7QeS2VzH+Vg6MGioZbcKc0M7C4OLLzeCnMBrMmMcDSuaGTedWW8tIro4Y jGH1r7dm1HIOA== Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 04:05:29 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Rob Clark Cc: Andrew Morton , Rob Clark , Sean Paul , NeilBrown , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mm tree Message-ID: <20220907040529.266d2d9c@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20220906210348.4744da42@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/8tpvhNu0+quhb6SToc.wTUt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/8tpvhNu0+quhb6SToc.wTUt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rob, On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 05:05:32 -0700 Rob Clark wrote: > > It looks like, at least for now, I can replace `sc->gfp_mask & > __GFP_ATOMIC` with `!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)`.. I'm not > sure if there would be any cases where we could otherwise sleep but > __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is not set? The commit message for 9178e3dcb121 seems to say that would be correct. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/8tpvhNu0+quhb6SToc.wTUt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmMXi+kACgkQAVBC80lX 0GxyRAf/cvSPJDrnkrS18iOz+Gg2YEtwYL92Zb1K7onewzTaXGxWgC5hKSdd+Hvn UHkScK+niw4xhLY+eGj70nbxyRlG5+wqFhebiEYFgZulSPwbsZ8B2H2CKmIfRW/c 2xlzoJWp8DrAMwoQHHu1TemxYI7NVdofwSAnz4qlWc7I5fytL0ZEnxS32tz8PlI5 iiahllsdGYN2iW26FR6iMI4ClzIOVzEg4s5d/hTw0zwanxd+kHwAKr2zmZsXD9NC 4FCaQPuL4xlcFE/5sRT3soSYmC6MbBV/gI11WEUwb7zYbeuEMm1cyd9eZTRSV1dW uY/bfC2UlaZ+J+kePMWfaRfGJJoKuw== =Idg9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8tpvhNu0+quhb6SToc.wTUt--