From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD27ECAAD3 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 16:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231890AbiIIQI4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2022 12:08:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39142 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231969AbiIIQIt (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2022 12:08:49 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70AC912B351 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:08:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1662739728; x=1694275728; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=IOusBextcdJmxpU1f1tWu5rHad0Vp5YhX9tuHZ5md1A=; b=H3gGUe0HOtSwzchgmt1/BB4i1Eo6OR8N/ytrz5aeWWf3RQ90aWqGViQU wEiDV9ej3MYAwhyIB/cfg6gu0cA4RleE9hyFjLdUF/AdRum7lPSkLaC0l cXAhPM9Eg6rk3nfuojtaR1+cpQYhop8MTeK0AvC/kxIyPPkwsijsfiFC2 ZBWRy4AYta4tSb28cY8hvWhOz8kK7+FcWV5KZoFO+BOJ5ZNr9h0fBKffX UtGspNm0BTjdNctN/88Jwxxi9aLTkpNJ4jWAXFiPen2x5ArCRlWZB0ylC +VBbwyVxkHUWnNTcPVQOuPVf1LOzedXCqd64eUpta0tCr4MCRVqBdyxrx Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10465"; a="297508385" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,303,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="297508385" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2022 09:08:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,303,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="677217634" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b2938d2e5c5a) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2022 09:08:43 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b2938d2e5c5a with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oWgYX-0001Pf-2u; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 16:08:37 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 00:07:54 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Vincent Guittot , mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parth@linux.ibm.com Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, qais.yousef@arm.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, David.Laight@aculab.com, pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, tj@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, joshdon@google.com, Vincent Guittot Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] sched/fair: Add latency list Message-ID: <202209092349.DjjxV7GB-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220909130309.25458-9-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220909130309.25458-9-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vincent, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on tip/sched/core] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.0-rc4 next-20220909] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vincent-Guittot/Add-latency-priority-for-CFS-class/20220909-210655 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git fb04563d1cae6f361892b4a339ad92100b1eb0d0 config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220909/202209092349.DjjxV7GB-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/4bdc6637b9aab44577b65686a745a14b325f4c23 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Vincent-Guittot/Add-latency-priority-for-CFS-class/20220909-210655 git checkout 4bdc6637b9aab44577b65686a745a14b325f4c23 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=m68k SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/sched/fair.c:727:22: warning: no previous prototype for '__pick_first_latency' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 727 | struct sched_entity *__pick_first_latency(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/sched/fair.c:742:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_update_scaling' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 742 | int sched_update_scaling(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/__pick_first_latency +727 kernel/sched/fair.c 726 > 727 struct sched_entity *__pick_first_latency(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) 728 { 729 struct rb_node *left = rb_first_cached(&cfs_rq->latency_timeline); 730 731 if (!left) 732 return NULL; 733 734 return __latency_node_2_se(left); 735 } 736 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp