From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7F4ECAAD3 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 18:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229533AbiIQSMM (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 14:12:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42766 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229457AbiIQSMJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 14:12:09 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3E22B242 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 11:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id u132so24246005pfc.6 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 11:12:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=TUmHLR+GSgYu7dtcYzNGTZciju4TnnNcKZxPhqTgdFY=; b=md7v8eBkL7OjZ0GnNG6vOgsqZFHpqcfwfU6u/r/GREXGiQZL/vdshx5bNycETrDFH3 CSUUidGIIi4kGjMbC5KCBa6xQNWNk61qTuTBqKkhhpsEULz/coO4dG8P0nkjuvw2rEGy x3UnzKbzHGo5taV5n90cGqrNiH0Y4UBAvNfG1gWWWEGV68LQLnNidLevw0BtQ26rXaxs WyMGpZ4Pl5kUPb22yeBzlxcCROnzFXmji0UDwFcVEDqSuoyFxCNN5dKiQGl5HstXoLPO nsyDAGMt1sJip7Pc9hAQRzhGbGzgKS6v3iE+3J8XF9yufK708gqrAFXsryFI/rmFkwwa 2lEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=TUmHLR+GSgYu7dtcYzNGTZciju4TnnNcKZxPhqTgdFY=; b=P0lwcRW/Y+9pyTfCpzp8kB3PWApaC82/rqe0KdAFsjmHsb+UWKnWeysQOLwA28oKKd tp8KauXOKwvlNMdbEuXudpEfliNN5VUMVQ4u6Ep+3kLdcnNFYpOJQG0/xJQyhOJtMTFJ Sio9Y8oRV5inmf3ve6XcPo/jR8n9hwWPLqhFRWR4xrLpeBI+/R5+4ZlRNu5tmnNM4mcT l6rIB/tadqTcKHGCLJkQjkuUNPktQUuuKNlND5yQ/ybFdulTCuxyoqivg8v+4E76GRdD 0t3s1I1ckBPOEf9qJRq2LpWQ/+zxiQFKS/J3GfPHFlCYpZ6isovTG+QWsLmj8Otbo4N7 M4Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1Grg77pGm+lEdx7JnZErL+4ru/AMQbRhXNbey7TsxWSM+fwi5Q hq45Jbz87LBsuRxNgIJtgaI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4ocTrC9bd47eOe59Y7u5uoUkYvEuMGz/z2Inc1IiIJcMIuSsP08orLRE86aAch7141q+kb0g== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5605:0:b0:438:ac3f:49cb with SMTP id k5-20020a635605000000b00438ac3f49cbmr9357799pgb.222.1663438327218; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 11:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uftrace.. ([14.5.161.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m8-20020a62a208000000b005386b58c8a3sm16632409pff.100.2022.09.17.11.12.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 11:12:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Kang Minchul To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Hans de Goede Cc: Fabio Aiuto , Kees Cook , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kang Minchul Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix coding style issue in block comment Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 03:11:30 +0900 Message-Id: <20220917181130.3237159-1-tegongkang@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch removes the following warning generated by checkpatch.pl WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines #206: FILE: rtw_recv.c:206: +/* +signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue) WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines #216: FILE: rtw_recv.c:216: +/* +caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread (passive) Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c index d8d394b67eeb..ad6fb6c3d1f0 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c @@ -203,22 +203,22 @@ signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *q } /* -signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue) -{ - return rtw_free_recvframe(precvframe, queue); -} -*/ + * signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue) + * { + * return rtw_free_recvframe(precvframe, queue); + * } + */ /* -caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread (passive) -pframequeue: defrag_queue : will be accessed in recv_thread (passive) - -using spinlock to protect - -*/ + * caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread (passive) + * pframequeue: defrag_queue : will be accessed in recv_thread (passive) + * + * using spinlock to protect + * + */ void rtw_free_recvframe_queue(struct __queue *pframequeue, struct __queue *pfree_recv_queue) { -- 2.34.1