From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] lib/find: optimize for_each() macros
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:05:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220919210559.1509179-7-yury.norov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220919210559.1509179-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Moving an iterator of the macros inside conditional part of for-loop
helps to generate a better code. It had been first implemented in commit
7baac8b91f9871ba ("cpumask: make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller").
Now that cpumask for-loops are the aliases to bitmap loops, it's worth
to optimize them the same way.
Bloat-o-meter says:
add/remove: 8/12 grow/shrink: 147/592 up/down: 4876/-24416 (-19540)
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/find.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/find.h b/include/linux/find.h
index 3b746a183216..0cdfab9734a6 100644
--- a/include/linux/find.h
+++ b/include/linux/find.h
@@ -458,31 +458,25 @@ unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
#endif
#define for_each_set_bit(bit, addr, size) \
- for ((bit) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), 0); \
- (bit) < (size); \
- (bit) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (bit) + 1))
+ for ((bit) = 0; (bit) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (bit)), (bit) < (size); (bit)++)
#define for_each_and_bit(bit, addr1, addr2, size) \
- for ((bit) = find_next_and_bit((addr1), (addr2), (size), 0); \
- (bit) < (size); \
- (bit) = find_next_and_bit((addr1), (addr2), (size), (bit) + 1))
+ for ((bit) = 0; \
+ (bit) = find_next_and_bit((addr1), (addr2), (size), (bit)), (bit) < (size);\
+ (bit)++)
/* same as for_each_set_bit() but use bit as value to start with */
#define for_each_set_bit_from(bit, addr, size) \
- for ((bit) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (bit)); \
- (bit) < (size); \
- (bit) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (bit) + 1))
+ for (; (bit) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (bit)), (bit) < (size); (bit)++)
#define for_each_clear_bit(bit, addr, size) \
- for ((bit) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), 0); \
- (bit) < (size); \
- (bit) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (bit) + 1))
+ for ((bit) = 0; \
+ (bit) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (bit)), (bit) < (size); \
+ (bit)++)
/* same as for_each_clear_bit() but use bit as value to start with */
#define for_each_clear_bit_from(bit, addr, size) \
- for ((bit) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (bit)); \
- (bit) < (size); \
- (bit) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (bit) + 1))
+ for (; (bit) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (bit)), (bit) < (size); (bit)++)
/**
* for_each_set_bitrange - iterate over all set bit ranges [b; e)
@@ -492,11 +486,11 @@ unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
* @size: bitmap size in number of bits
*/
#define for_each_set_bitrange(b, e, addr, size) \
- for ((b) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), 0), \
- (e) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1); \
+ for ((b) = 0; \
+ (b) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), b), \
+ (e) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1), \
(b) < (size); \
- (b) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (e) + 1), \
- (e) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1))
+ (b) = (e) + 1)
/**
* for_each_set_bitrange_from - iterate over all set bit ranges [b; e)
@@ -506,11 +500,11 @@ unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
* @size: bitmap size in number of bits
*/
#define for_each_set_bitrange_from(b, e, addr, size) \
- for ((b) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (b)), \
- (e) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1); \
+ for (; \
+ (b) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (b)), \
+ (e) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1), \
(b) < (size); \
- (b) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (e) + 1), \
- (e) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1))
+ (b) = (e) + 1)
/**
* for_each_clear_bitrange - iterate over all unset bit ranges [b; e)
@@ -520,11 +514,11 @@ unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
* @size: bitmap size in number of bits
*/
#define for_each_clear_bitrange(b, e, addr, size) \
- for ((b) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), 0), \
- (e) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1); \
+ for ((b) = 0; \
+ (b) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b)), \
+ (e) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1), \
(b) < (size); \
- (b) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (e) + 1), \
- (e) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1))
+ (b) = (e) + 1)
/**
* for_each_clear_bitrange_from - iterate over all unset bit ranges [b; e)
@@ -534,11 +528,11 @@ unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
* @size: bitmap size in number of bits
*/
#define for_each_clear_bitrange_from(b, e, addr, size) \
- for ((b) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b)), \
- (e) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1); \
+ for (; \
+ (b) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (b)), \
+ (e) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1), \
(b) < (size); \
- (b) = find_next_zero_bit((addr), (size), (e) + 1), \
- (e) = find_next_bit((addr), (size), (b) + 1))
+ (b) = (e) + 1)
/**
* for_each_set_bit_wrap - iterate over all set bits starting from @start, and
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-19 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-19 21:05 [PATCH 0/7] cpumask: repair cpumask_check() Yury Norov
2022-09-19 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpumask: fix checking valid cpu range Yury Norov
2022-09-28 12:18 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-28 14:49 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-30 17:04 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-10-01 2:02 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-19 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] net: fix cpu_max_bits_warn() usage in netif_attrmask_next{,_and} Yury Norov
2022-09-26 17:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-26 17:47 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-19 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpumask: switch for_each_cpu{,_not} to use for_each_bit() Yury Norov
2022-09-19 21:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] lib/find_bit: add find_next{,_and}_bit_wrap Yury Norov
2022-09-19 21:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] lib/bitmap: introduce for_each_set_bit_wrap() macro Yury Norov
2022-09-19 21:05 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2022-09-19 21:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] lib/bitmap: add tests for for_each() loops Yury Norov
2022-09-25 15:47 ` [PATCH 0/7] cpumask: repair cpumask_check() Yury Norov
2022-09-26 15:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-26 16:27 ` Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220919210559.1509179-7-yury.norov@gmail.com \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®