[PATCH v4 2/7] acpi/x86: s2idle: If a new AMD _HID is missing assume Rembrandt

[Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>]

A mistake was made that only AMDI0007 was set to rev of "2", but
it should have been also set for AMDI008. If an ID is missing from
the _HID table, then assume it matches Rembrandt behavior.

This implicitly means that if any other behavior changes happen
in the future missing IDs must be added to that table.

Tested-by: catalin@antebit.com
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> # GA402RJ
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v2->v3:
 * Add tags
---
 drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
index 28a3ef9a6bc1..2c5931d247a2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
 		if (dev_id)
 			data = (const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data *) dev_id->driver_data;
 		else
-			return 0;
+			data = &amd_rembrandt;
 		rev_id = data->rev_id;
 		lps0_dsm_func_mask = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
 					ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_AMD, rev_id, &lps0_dsm_guid);
-- 
2.34.1