From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: split initialization into early arch step and later non-arch step
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:22:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220926092241.64f73e7420cea6b964f1f116@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220926160332.1473462-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 18:03:32 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
> The full RNG initialization relies on some timestamps, made possible
> with general functions like time_init() and timekeeping_init(). However,
> these are only available rather late in initialization. Meanwhile, other
> things, such as memory allocator functions, make use of the RNG much
> earlier.
>
> So split RNG initialization into two phases. We can give arch randomness
> very early on, and then later, after timekeeping and such are available,
> initialize the rest.
>
> This ensures that, for example, slabs are properly randomized if RDRAND
> is available. Another positive consequence is that on systems with
> RDRAND, running with CONFIG_WARN_ALL_UNSEEDED_RANDOM=y results in no
> warnings at all.
Please give a full description of the user-visible runtime effects of
this shortcoming.
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Which is important when proposing a -stable backport.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-26 16:03 Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-26 16:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-09-26 16:29 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-26 18:22 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-26 18:52 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-27 3:23 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-27 8:34 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-09-27 9:30 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220926092241.64f73e7420cea6b964f1f116@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®