[PATCH 3/5] ring-buffer: Add ring_buffer_wake_waiters()

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>]

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

On closing of a file that represents a ring buffer or flushing the file,
there may be waiters on the ring buffer that needs to be woken up and exit
the ring_buffer_wait() function.

Add ring_buffer_wake_waiters() to wake up the waiters on the ring buffer
and allow them to exit the wait loop.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 15693458c4bc0 ("tracing/ring-buffer: Move poll wake ups into ring buffer code")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 include/linux/ring_buffer.h |  2 +-
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c  | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ring_buffer.h b/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
index dac53fd3afea..2504df9a0453 100644
--- a/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
+++ b/include/linux/ring_buffer.h
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ __ring_buffer_alloc(unsigned long size, unsigned flags, struct lock_class_key *k
 int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full);
 __poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
 			  struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table);
-
+void ring_buffer_wake_waiters(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu);
 
 #define RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS -1
 
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 5a7d818ca3ea..677812b8fae0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ struct rb_irq_work {
 	struct irq_work			work;
 	wait_queue_head_t		waiters;
 	wait_queue_head_t		full_waiters;
+	long				wait_index;
 	bool				waiters_pending;
 	bool				full_waiters_pending;
 	bool				wakeup_full;
@@ -924,6 +925,32 @@ static void rb_wake_up_waiters(struct irq_work *work)
 	}
 }
 
+/**
+ * ring_buffer_wake_waiters - wake up any waiters on this ring buffer
+ * @buffer: The ring buffer to wake waiters on
+ *
+ * In the case of a file that represents a ring buffer is closing,
+ * it is prudent to wake up any waiters that are on this.
+ */
+void ring_buffer_wake_waiters(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
+{
+	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
+	struct rb_irq_work *rbwork;
+
+	if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
+		rbwork = &buffer->irq_work;
+	} else {
+		cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
+		rbwork = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
+	}
+
+	rbwork->wait_index++;
+	/* make sure the waiters see the new index */
+	smp_wmb();
+
+	rb_wake_up_waiters(&rbwork->work);
+}
+
 /**
  * ring_buffer_wait - wait for input to the ring buffer
  * @buffer: buffer to wait on
@@ -939,6 +966,7 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 	struct rb_irq_work *work;
+	long wait_index;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -957,6 +985,7 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
 		work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
 	}
 
+	wait_index = READ_ONCE(work->wait_index);
 
 	while (true) {
 		if (full)
@@ -1021,6 +1050,11 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
 		}
 
 		schedule();
+
+		/* Make sure to see the new wait index */
+		smp_rmb();
+		if (wait_index != work->wait_index)
+			break;
 	}
 
 	if (full)
-- 
2.35.1