From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
To: isaku.yamahata@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/30] KVM: Add arch hooks when VM is added/deleted
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 17:16:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221004001621.GJ2414580@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aab342d576fe22b8f5b27e61d4fc635d45a4f866.1663869838.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:20:39AM -0700,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
>
> and pass kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock. Move kvm_arch_post_init_vm() under
> kvm_arch_add_vm(). Replace enable/disable_hardware_all() with the default
> implementation of kvm_arch_add/del_vm(). Later kvm_arch_post_init_vm() is
> deleted once x86 overrides kvm_arch_add_vm().
>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index eab352902de7..3fbb01bbac98 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1445,6 +1445,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> bool kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> bool kvm_arch_dy_has_pending_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_arch_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> +int kvm_arch_add_vm(struct kvm *kvm, int usage_count);
> +int kvm_arch_del_vm(int usage_count);
> void kvm_arch_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> int kvm_arch_create_vm_debugfs(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index c4b908553726..e2c8823786ff 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -142,8 +142,9 @@ static int kvm_no_compat_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> #define KVM_COMPAT(c) .compat_ioctl = kvm_no_compat_ioctl, \
> .open = kvm_no_compat_open
> #endif
> -static int hardware_enable_all(void);
> -static void hardware_disable_all(void);
> +static void hardware_enable_nolock(void *junk);
> +static void hardware_disable_nolock(void *junk);
> +static void kvm_del_vm(void);
>
> static void kvm_io_bus_destroy(struct kvm_io_bus *bus);
>
> @@ -1106,6 +1107,41 @@ int __weak kvm_arch_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Called after the VM is otherwise initialized, but just before adding it to
> + * the vm_list.
> + */
> +int __weak kvm_arch_add_vm(struct kvm *kvm, int usage_count)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> +
> + if (usage_count != 1)
> + return 0;
Oops. This line should be.
+ return kvm_arch_post_init_vm(kvm);
"KVM: x86: Duplicate arch callbacks related to pm events and compat check"
should have same line. "KVM: Eliminate kvm_arch_post_init_vm()" should include
kvm_mmu_post_init_vm().
It creates a kernel thread. kvm unit test didn't catch it.
Thanks,
> +
> + atomic_set(&hardware_enable_failed, 0);
> + on_each_cpu(hardware_enable_nolock, NULL, 1);
> +
> + if (atomic_read(&hardware_enable_failed)) {
> + r = -EBUSY;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + r = kvm_arch_post_init_vm(kvm);
> +err:
> + if (r)
> + on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +int __weak kvm_arch_del_vm(int usage_count)
> +{
> + if (usage_count)
> + return 0;
> +
> + on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock, NULL, 1);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Called just after removing the VM from the vm_list, but before doing any
> * other destruction.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-04 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-22 18:20 [PATCH v5 00/30] KVM: hardware enable/disable reorganize isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 01/30] KVM: x86: Drop kvm_user_return_msr_cpu_online() isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 02/30] KVM: x86: Use this_cpu_ptr() instead of per_cpu_ptr(smp_processor_id()) isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 03/30] KVM: x86: Move check_processor_compatibility from init ops to runtime ops isaku.yamahata
2022-10-11 19:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 04/30] Partially revert "KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs" isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 05/30] KVM: Provide more information in kernel log if hardware enabling fails isaku.yamahata
2022-10-12 19:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 06/30] KVM: arm64: Simplify the CPUHP logic isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 07/30] KVM: Rename and move CPUHP_AP_KVM_STARTING to ONLINE section isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/30] KVM: Do compatibility checks on hotplugged CPUs isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 09/30] KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock isaku.yamahata
2022-10-12 20:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 10/30] KVM: Add arch hooks when VM is added/deleted isaku.yamahata
2022-10-04 0:16 ` Isaku Yamahata [this message]
2022-10-12 20:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 11/30] KVM: Add arch hook for reboot event isaku.yamahata
2022-10-12 20:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 12/30] KVM: Add arch hook for suspend isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 13/30] KVM: Add arch hook for resume event isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 14/30] KVM: Add arch hook for cpu online event isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 15/30] KVM: Add arch hook for cpu offline event isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 16/30] KVM: Remove on_each_cpu(hardware_disable_nolock) in kvm_exit() isaku.yamahata
2022-10-12 20:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 17/30] KVM: Move out KVM arch PM hooks and hardware enable/disable logic isaku.yamahata
2022-10-12 21:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 18/30] KVM: kvm_arch.c: Remove _nolock post fix isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 19/30] KVM: kvm_arch.c: Remove a global variable, hardware_enable_failed isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 20/30] KVM: Introduce an arch wrapper to check all processor compatibility isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 21/30] KVM: x86: Duplicate arch callbacks related to pm events and compat check isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 22/30] KVM: x86: Move TSC fixup logic to KVM arch resume callback isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 23/30] KVM: Eliminate kvm_arch_post_init_vm() isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 24/30] KVM: Add config to not compile kvm_arch.c isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 25/30] KVM: x86: Delete kvm_arch_hardware_enable/disable() isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 26/30] KVM: x86: Make x86 processor compat check callback empty isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 27/30] RFC: KVM: powerpc: Move processor compatibility check to hardware setup isaku.yamahata
2022-09-23 6:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-09-27 0:40 ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 28/30] KVM: Eliminate kvm_arch_check_processor_compat() isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 29/30] RFC: KVM: x86: Remove cpus_hardware_enabled and related sanity check isaku.yamahata
2022-09-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v5 30/30] RFC: KVM: " isaku.yamahata
2022-10-13 0:25 ` [PATCH v5 00/30] KVM: hardware enable/disable reorganize Sean Christopherson
2022-10-14 4:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-02 18:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-02 18:59 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221004001621.GJ2414580@ls.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®