mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] KVM: selftest: Add PMU feature framework, use in PMU event filter test
Date: Thu,  6 Oct 2022 00:51:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221006005125.680782-10-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221006005125.680782-1-seanjc@google.com>

Add an X86_PMU_FEATURE_* framework to simplify probing architectural
events on Intel PMUs, which require checking the length of a bit vector
and the _absence_ of a "feature" bit.  Add helpers for both KVM and
"this CPU", and use the newfangled magic (along with X86_PROPERTY_*)
to  clean up pmu_event_filter_test.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h  | 41 +++++++++++++++
 .../kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c        | 51 +++----------------
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
index 209de48eb501..acad7184d1b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
@@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_property {
 
 #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_BASIC_LEAF		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
 #define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 0, 7)
+#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 8, 15)
+#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EBX_BIT_VECTOR_LENGTH	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 24, 31)
 
 #define X86_PROPERTY_XSTATE_MAX_SIZE_XCR0	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xd,  0, EBX,  0, 31)
 #define X86_PROPERTY_XSTATE_MAX_SIZE		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xd,  0, ECX,  0, 31)
@@ -221,6 +223,29 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_property {
 
 #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_CENTAUR_LEAF		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xC0000000, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
 
+/*
+ * Intel's architectural PMU events are bizarre.  They have a "feature" bit
+ * that indicates the feature is _not_ supported, and a property that states
+ * the length of the bit mask of unsupported features.  A feature is supported
+ * if the size of the bit mask is larger than the "unavailable" bit, and said
+ * bit is not set.
+ *
+ * Wrap the "unavailable" feature to simplify checking whether or not a given
+ * architectural event is supported.
+ */
+struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature {
+	struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature anti_feature;
+};
+#define	KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(name, __bit)					\
+({										\
+	struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature feature = {					\
+		.anti_feature = KVM_X86_CPU_FEATURE(0xa, 0, EBX, __bit),	\
+	};									\
+										\
+	feature;								\
+})
+
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED	KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED, 5)
 
 /* Page table bitfield declarations */
 #define PTE_PRESENT_MASK        BIT_ULL(0)
@@ -529,6 +554,14 @@ static __always_inline bool this_cpu_has_p(struct kvm_x86_cpu_property property)
 	return max_leaf >= property.function;
 }
 
+static inline bool this_pmu_has(struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature feature)
+{
+	uint32_t nr_bits = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EBX_BIT_VECTOR_LENGTH);
+
+	return nr_bits > feature.anti_feature.bit &&
+	       !this_cpu_has(feature.anti_feature);
+}
+
 #define SET_XMM(__var, __xmm) \
 	asm volatile("movq %0, %%"#__xmm : : "r"(__var) : #__xmm)
 
@@ -737,6 +770,14 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_cpu_has_p(struct kvm_x86_cpu_property property)
 	return max_leaf >= property.function;
 }
 
+static inline bool kvm_pmu_has(struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature feature)
+{
+	uint32_t nr_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EBX_BIT_VECTOR_LENGTH);
+
+	return nr_bits > feature.anti_feature.bit &&
+	       !kvm_cpu_has(feature.anti_feature);
+}
+
 static inline size_t kvm_cpuid2_size(int nr_entries)
 {
 	return sizeof(struct kvm_cpuid2) +
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
index ea4e259a1e2e..5cc88ac31c45 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
@@ -21,29 +21,6 @@
 #define ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS			(1ULL << 17)
 #define ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE			(1ULL << 22)
 
-union cpuid10_eax {
-	struct {
-		unsigned int version_id:8;
-		unsigned int num_counters:8;
-		unsigned int bit_width:8;
-		unsigned int mask_length:8;
-	} split;
-	unsigned int full;
-};
-
-union cpuid10_ebx {
-	struct {
-		unsigned int no_unhalted_core_cycles:1;
-		unsigned int no_instructions_retired:1;
-		unsigned int no_unhalted_reference_cycles:1;
-		unsigned int no_llc_reference:1;
-		unsigned int no_llc_misses:1;
-		unsigned int no_branch_instruction_retired:1;
-		unsigned int no_branch_misses_retired:1;
-	} split;
-	unsigned int full;
-};
-
 /* End of stuff taken from perf_event.h. */
 
 /* Oddly, this isn't in perf_event.h. */
@@ -380,30 +357,16 @@ static void test_pmu_config_disable(void (*guest_code)(void))
 }
 
 /*
- * Check for a non-zero PMU version, at least one general-purpose
- * counter per logical processor, an EBX bit vector of length greater
- * than 5, and EBX[5] clear.
- */
-static bool check_intel_pmu_leaf(const struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry)
-{
-	union cpuid10_eax eax = { .full = entry->eax };
-	union cpuid10_ebx ebx = { .full = entry->ebx };
-
-	return eax.split.version_id && eax.split.num_counters > 0 &&
-		eax.split.mask_length > ARCH_PERFMON_BRANCHES_RETIRED &&
-		!ebx.split.no_branch_instruction_retired;
-}
-
-/*
- * Note that CPUID leaf 0xa is Intel-specific. This leaf should be
- * clear on AMD hardware.
+ * On Intel, check for a non-zero PMU version, at least one general-purpose
+ * counter per logical processor, and support for counting the number of branch
+ * instructions retired.
  */
 static bool use_intel_pmu(void)
 {
-	const struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
-
-	entry = kvm_get_supported_cpuid_entry(0xa);
-	return is_intel_cpu() && check_intel_pmu_leaf(entry);
+	return is_intel_cpu() &&
+	       kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION) &&
+	       kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS) &&
+	       kvm_pmu_has(X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED);
 }
 
 static bool is_zen1(uint32_t eax)
-- 
2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-06  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-06  0:51 [PATCH 00/12] KVM: selftests: Add X86_PROPERTY_* magic Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: selftests: Add X86_FEATURE_PAE and use it calc "fallback" MAXPHYADDR Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: selftests: Refactor X86_FEATURE_* framework to prep for X86_PROPERTY_* Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: selftests: Add X86_PROPERTY_* framework to retrieve CPUID values Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: selftests: Use X86_PROPERTY_MAX_KVM_LEAF in CPUID test Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: selftests: Refactor kvm_cpuid_has() to prep for X86_PROPERTY_* support Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 06/12] KVM: selftests: Add kvm_cpu_*() support for X86_PROPERTY_* Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: selftests: Convert AMX test to use X86_PROPRETY_XXX Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 08/12] KVM: selftests: Convert vmx_pmu_caps_test to use X86_PROPERTY_* Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: selftests: Add dedicated helpers for getting x86 Family and Model Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: selftests: Add and use KVM helpers for " Sean Christopherson
2022-10-06  0:51 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: selftest: Drop helpers for getting specific KVM supported CPUID entry Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221006005125.680782-10-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®