Hi Paolo,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on axboe-block/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.0 next-20221005]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Paolo-Valente/block-bfq-extend-bfq-to-support-multi-actuator-drives/20221004-174503
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next
config: i386-randconfig-m021-20221003
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-5) 11.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

New smatch warnings:
block/bfq-iosched.c:7009 bfq_put_async_queues() warn: inconsistent indenting

Old smatch warnings:
block/bfq-iosched.c:6133 __bfq_insert_request() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'bfqq' (see line 6129)

vim +7009 block/bfq-iosched.c

  6993	
  6994	/*
  6995	 * Release all the bfqg references to its async queues.  If we are
  6996	 * deallocating the group these queues may still contain requests, so
  6997	 * we reparent them to the root cgroup (i.e., the only one that will
  6998	 * exist for sure until all the requests on a device are gone).
  6999	 */
  7000	void bfq_put_async_queues(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_group *bfqg)
  7001	{
  7002		int i, j, k;
  7003	
  7004		for (k = 0; k < BFQ_NUM_ACTUATORS; k++) {
  7005			for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
  7006				for (j = 0; j < IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS; j++)
  7007					__bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_bfqq[i][j][k]);
  7008	
> 7009		__bfq_put_async_bfqq(bfqd, &bfqg->async_idle_bfqq[k]);
  7010		}
  7011	}
  7012	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp