tree:   https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git stable-6.0
head:   3405ac932abaa81ce2e1cf0f8cc9b311f7a8287d
commit: 3405ac932abaa81ce2e1cf0f8cc9b311f7a8287d [1/1] btrfs: unlock locked extent area if we have contention
config: m68k-allyesconfig
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel/commit/3405ac932abaa81ce2e1cf0f8cc9b311f7a8287d
        git remote add kdave-btrfs-devel https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git
        git fetch --no-tags kdave-btrfs-devel stable-6.0
        git checkout 3405ac932abaa81ce2e1cf0f8cc9b311f7a8287d
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=m68k SHELL=/bin/bash fs/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function 'lock_extent_bits':
>> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1502:57: warning: passing argument 5 of 'clear_extent_bit' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
    1502 |                                          EXTENT_LOCKED, cached_state);
         |                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                                         |
         |                                                         struct extent_state **
   fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1466:36: note: expected 'int' but argument is of type 'struct extent_state **'
    1466 |                      u32 bits, int wake, int delete,
         |                                ~~~~^~~~
   fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1501:25: error: too few arguments to function 'clear_extent_bit'
    1501 |                         clear_extent_bit(tree, start, failed_start - 1,
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1465:5: note: declared here
    1465 | int clear_extent_bit(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 end,
         |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1505:23: error: implicit declaration of function '__set_extent_bit'; did you mean 'set_extent_bit'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    1505 |                 err = __set_extent_bit(tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED,
         |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                       set_extent_bit
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/clear_extent_bit +1502 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c

  1485	
  1486	/*
  1487	 * either insert or lock state struct between start and end use mask to tell
  1488	 * us if waiting is desired.
  1489	 */
  1490	int lock_extent_bits(struct extent_io_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 end,
  1491			     struct extent_state **cached_state)
  1492	{
  1493		int err;
  1494		u64 failed_start;
  1495	
  1496		err = set_extent_bit(tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED,
  1497				     EXTENT_LOCKED, &failed_start,
  1498				     cached_state, GFP_NOFS, NULL);
  1499		while (err == -EEXIST) {
  1500			if (failed_start != start)
  1501				clear_extent_bit(tree, start, failed_start - 1,
> 1502						 EXTENT_LOCKED, cached_state);
  1503	
  1504			wait_extent_bit(tree, failed_start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED);
  1505			err = __set_extent_bit(tree, start, end, EXTENT_LOCKED,
  1506					       &failed_start, cached_state, NULL,
  1507					       GFP_NOFS);
  1508		}
  1509		return err;
  1510	}
  1511	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp