Re: Unloaded tainted modules list with tcrypt

[Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>]

On Tue 2022-10-11 00:09 +0000, Elliott, Robert (Servers) wrote:
> Changing to == seems to work well - that shows incremented counts
> rather than new entries:
> Unloaded tainted modules: tcrypt():40 padlock_aes():1 isst_if_mbox_msr():56 pcc_cpufreq():56 acpi_cpufreq():112

Hi Elliott,

Please note, any module that does not carry a taint should _not_
be on the aforementioned list. See the following which is already
in Linus' tree:

commit 47cc75aa92837a9d3f15157d6272ff285585d75d
Author: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Oct 7 14:38:12 2022 +0100

    module: tracking: Keep a record of tainted unloaded modules only
    
    This ensures that no module record/or entry is added to the
    unloaded_tainted_modules list if it does not carry a taint.
    
    Reported-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
    Fixes: 99bd9956551b ("module: Introduce module unload taint tracking")
    Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
    Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/kernel/module/tracking.c b/kernel/module/tracking.c
index a139e63b6f20..26d812e07615 100644
--- a/kernel/module/tracking.c
+++ b/kernel/module/tracking.c
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ int try_add_tainted_module(struct module *mod)
 
 	module_assert_mutex_or_preempt();
 
+	if (!mod->taints)
+		goto out;
+
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod_taint, &unloaded_tainted_modules, list,
 				lockdep_is_held(&module_mutex)) {
 		if (!strcmp(mod_taint->name, mod->name) &&


-- 
Aaron Tomlin