From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com,
urezki@gmail.com, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, frederic@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, youssefesmat@google.com,
surenb@google.com,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH v8 03/13] rcu: Refactor code a bit in rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass()
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:01:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221011180142.2742289-4-joel@joelfernandes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221011180142.2742289-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
This consolidates the code a bit and makes it cleaner. Functionally it
is the same.
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index e852c060d4e3..5ce66f9f4a98 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -327,10 +327,11 @@ static void wake_nocb_gp_defer(struct rcu_data *rdp, int waketype,
*
* Note that this function always returns true if rhp is NULL.
*/
-static bool rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
+static bool rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp_in,
unsigned long j, bool lazy)
{
struct rcu_cblist rcl;
+ struct rcu_head *rhp = rhp_in;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp));
rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected(rdp);
@@ -345,16 +346,16 @@ static bool rcu_nocb_do_flush_bypass(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
/*
* If the new CB requested was a lazy one, queue it onto the main
- * ->cblist so we can take advantage of a sooner grade period.
+ * ->cblist so that we can take advantage of the grace-period that will
+ * happen regardless. But queue it onto the bypass list first so that
+ * the lazy CB is ordered with the existing CBs in the bypass list.
*/
if (lazy && rhp) {
- rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue(&rcl, &rdp->nocb_bypass, NULL);
- rcu_cblist_enqueue(&rcl, rhp);
- WRITE_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len, 0);
- } else {
- rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue(&rcl, &rdp->nocb_bypass, rhp);
- WRITE_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len, 0);
+ rcu_cblist_enqueue(&rdp->nocb_bypass, rhp);
+ rhp = NULL;
}
+ rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue(&rcl, &rdp->nocb_bypass, rhp);
+ WRITE_ONCE(rdp->lazy_len, 0);
rcu_segcblist_insert_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist, &rcl);
WRITE_ONCE(rdp->nocb_bypass_first, j);
--
2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-11 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-11 18:01 [PATCH v8 00/13] rcu: call_rcu() power improvements Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] rcu: Fix missing nocb gp wake on rcu_barrier() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-14 14:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-14 14:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-14 15:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-14 15:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-14 15:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-14 20:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-16 15:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-16 15:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] rcu: Make call_rcu() lazy to save power Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 23:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-12 19:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-14 15:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-11 18:01 ` Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] rcu: shrinker for lazy rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] rcuscale: Add laziness and kfree tests Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] percpu-refcount: Use call_rcu_flush() for atomic switch Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] rcu/sync: Use call_rcu_flush() instead of call_rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] rcu/rcuscale: Use call_rcu_flush() for async reader test Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] rcu/rcutorture: Use call_rcu_flush() where needed Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] scsi/scsi_error: Use call_rcu_flush() instead of call_rcu() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] workqueue: Make queue_rcu_work() use call_rcu_flush() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] rxrpc: Use call_rcu_flush() instead of call_rcu() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-10-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] rcu/debug: Add wake-up debugging for lazy callbacks Joel Fernandes (Google)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221011180142.2742289-4-joel@joelfernandes.org \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=youssefesmat@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®