From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2532BC4332F for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 02:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229572AbiJLC2V (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 22:28:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45172 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229471AbiJLC2T (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2022 22:28:19 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F200EA6C22; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 19:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABAD2B818D3; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 02:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E6C6C433C1; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 02:28:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1665541696; bh=vw6gsGbne+1unyAJpVc3ZFwZjNHdqONWQBeoeJEwRRU=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=mPwolRD+51ZSJoDRF3c1ERe0UbqjCI0K+FcYQKPKJ2ohIHPSXIF43c91DnJ5SxZrp LsfXuIOWqvp/mSgtYJ0pcMW3dvgvvrW5HPVqwkoEep9SUvwMjFrBhBTsD8xZQuVj0w Jzca21Wjk/8F+bjXRLFt+p8Myv1/rCQl0Klmbf2uBFUTqWVguCPsRYDFFVZ5uKn0kM JGfNhH4a8uXVq4KdDcnY7FiAWoNa8r2XmgYvNoL5sW6AtFDPzskstDk8nOpxhogQta 2yWr7UwAoYDkrflDapyNk202V94wI1jFLXL5Jz9bC32RqvYSlfRIiQfmQf2kZaDFOz 7OEl0jkMVBPHg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20221008051534.151392-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> References: <20221008051534.151392-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: fix the build with binutils 2.27 From: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kefeng Wang To: Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , Kefeng Wang , Nicolas Ferre , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 19:28:14 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Message-Id: <20221012022816.5E6C6C433C1@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Kefeng Wang (2022-10-07 22:15:34) > diff --git a/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h b/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h > index 3484309b59bf..4fc387d0335d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h > +++ b/include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ > #ifndef AT91_PMC_H > #define AT91_PMC_H > =20 > +#include Can we just include linux/bits.h instead? It looks weird to include vdso/ outside of the kernel's vdso. > + > #define AT91_PMC_V1 (1) /* PMC version 1 = */ > #define AT91_PMC_V2 (2) /* PMC version 2 = [SAM9X60] */ >