From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285C8C433FE for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230218AbiJQQSx (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:18:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44808 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230268AbiJQQSo (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:18:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FAC66DF8A for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id s30so16817449eds.1 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:18:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EvKXXBfjBxozfV6WFzYGdtAGU5x1cXP77F9OEOiHjRA=; b=hF2zG+QODFU7vhHtcL27fRDayxvbsN8P6jQWLQnMg+jXt4yc3MymyuXu/gGux8kTI1 0Zrhj4OCrvC5HA1Gaq4zgv3DgVeyC/S34yGYcYwTmo8ouI/Ail+VUQRwFI2mV2DZoZUv H31iS/2OgtsBzHK76ThDDMx8h/4R68ZyRWspWPIM2swVIa6g0ufgzXGJQW8v7T/y1bZj a6xjYRGYmtQndob/ZtBcIQHfjrZNScOcPt3bhi+HYh/OCqvt384HKOr1X8WSaCt5qwxv 2W7+mnYglhCAcBlzDfqgTybNZa61lWisHM7zcf+PDYKhaa0Ga8bQAkwlgbcgMb8Wm8K+ wc6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=EvKXXBfjBxozfV6WFzYGdtAGU5x1cXP77F9OEOiHjRA=; b=gw1+cXkcSIPXd7M4kYCIIr5SdtrJE9HN3QNjjF0C2GG8EZqP3yt2EFT8BgqVzcIT0r eB9iFc6FLm86GNgeUKz5KloZEriFabtb1QYkswukJ9/V7a1D7ix0kn+iHbB6cXfJiviG pcI8oYC3nuTQoKWgNDczlvm65RBCwonoHYqEMGe6WQ2x+Fi9B/pBsroKdWc0W16LFVB1 d5/Bv9wgAJE2PW49aSHAkJSc42tE04eMeTevD6A8PgIpepHMSC93af4GbuKkuGECWPjl c3cT4o6bPjkIfz0krZOCOMGA7j1NGCMXwBfBLTPhAWqvjFxg/X2pdRNW5WJG8r5q2HHY wgNA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3IJDOrDO3580QEOmiWT76FKXZOPLCdTcigTnTTacijGgLWmr8z trzQlUY0ExPqw//AqJG0OFti/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6ARby/6+Um7l8K2gj3ebnctRHo0Xc/NKdIW4tMZZYU4QtVwZMcJLLaa41J8jCUicQYTvhBHg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:42d0:b0:457:d16e:283d with SMTP id i16-20020a05640242d000b00457d16e283dmr11053428edc.395.1666023521673; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cst2-173-61.cust.vodafone.cz. [31.30.173.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id et11-20020a056402378b00b0045c47b2a800sm7483488edb.67.2022.10.17.09.18.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:18:40 +0200 From: Andrew Jones To: Conor Dooley Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , Conor Dooley , Dao Lu , Heiko Stuebner , Guo Ren , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] (attempt to) Fix RISC-V toolchain extension support detection Message-ID: <20221017161840.7o5tpsjox7klyvvs@kamzik> References: <20221006173520.1785507-1-conor@kernel.org> <20221017155103.4dt5uzmnlbtibqcn@kamzik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:03:48PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 05:51:03PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:35:19PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > However, we could also drop the compiler and linker checking if we > > converted our use of cbo.* to the insn-def.h framework (I think Heiko once > > mentioned looking at doing that, but I'm not sure.) I'm looking at adding > > Zicboz support right now and for starters I've duplicated and modified > > these checks. But, I think I'll look into defining the instruction type > > needed for cbo.* and using insn-def instead. > > What is the ETA of your zicboz support? Do you think these patches > should be applied to v6.1 & backported before being replaced by insn-def > when your zicboz support arrives? Or just wait for your zicboz series? I hope to have something posted by the end of this week, so if all things go well, it could land in 6.1. I think it's reasonable to merge your patches anyway, though, as they fix the current code and we don't know what rabbit holes I may fall in with my series yet. Thanks, drew > > Trying to decide what status I should set for this in patchwork. > > Thanks, > Conor. >