From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.1-rc3
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:37:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221101183717.GB1328619@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wi+5sRXL9fTHQRiR9zVEFDPhQceWACBG3QQ=9xoRVmR8g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:29:01AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> [ Adding Arnd and Masahiro in case they remember what the secret sauce
> for finding those cases was ]
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 10:00 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > There is one spurious build error. It does not happen all the time,
> > and even on the same SHA it is not easy to reproduce. If I see it,
> > I may see it on one server reliably but not at all on another with
> > almost the same hardware configuration.
> >
> > Building powerpc:allnoconfig ... failed
> > --------------
> > Error log:
> > Inconsistent kallsyms data
> > Try make KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS=1 as a workaround
>
> The random "Inconsistent kallsyms data" issue is something that we've
> had for over a decade.
>
I know. Difference this time around, at least for me, is that the
table is oscillating and never converges. Another difference is that
it looks like the problem was introduced by a change in how the table
is created, not by a change in the code or the compiler/linker.
I do have a patch that lets me run as many extra passes as I want,
but that doesn't help if the table never converges.
If anyone has an idea how I can track this down, I'll be happy
to give it a try.
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-01 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-30 22:35 Linus Torvalds
2022-11-01 8:02 ` Build regressions/improvements in v6.1-rc3 Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-11-01 8:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-11-01 17:00 ` Linux 6.1-rc3 Guenter Roeck
2022-11-01 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-11-01 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-11-01 17:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-01 18:19 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-11-01 18:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-11-01 18:37 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2023-02-02 7:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-02 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221101183717.GB1328619@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®