From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Zhang Qiang1 <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: allow mem_dump_obj() to be called in interrupt context
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:54:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221114165443.98042d9244ee8899901df164@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221112121537.1634-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 20:15:37 +0800 Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> wrote:
> The function mem_dump_obj() can sometimes provide valuable debugging
> information, but it cannot be called in an interrupt context because
> spinlock vmap_area_lock has not been protected against IRQs. If the
> current task has held the lock before hard/soft interrupt handler calls
> mem_dump_obj(), simply abandoning the dump operation can avoid deadlock.
> That is, no deadlock occurs in extreme cases, and dump succeeds in most
> cases.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -4034,6 +4034,9 @@ bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object)
> struct vm_struct *vm;
> void *objp = (void *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)object);
>
> + if (unlikely(spin_is_locked(&vmap_area_lock)))
> + return false;
> +
> vm = find_vm_area(objp);
> if (!vm)
> return false;
Yes, but this will worsen the current uses of this function. Consider
the case where task A wants to call vmalloc_dump_obj() but task B holds
vmap_area_lock. No problem, task A will simply spin until task B is
done.
But after this patch, task A's call to vmalloc_dump_obj() will return
without having done anything.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-15 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-12 12:15 Zhen Lei
2022-11-15 0:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2022-11-15 2:01 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2022-11-16 14:05 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221114165443.98042d9244ee8899901df164@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®