From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05479C4332F for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 05:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231990AbiKSFwP (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2022 00:52:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38750 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229878AbiKSFwL (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2022 00:52:11 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD348FE4E; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NDjPF3JfKzqSVS; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:48:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemm600005.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.191) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:52:08 +0800 Received: from ubuntu1804.huawei.com (10.67.175.30) by kwepemm600005.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.191) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:52:07 +0800 From: Hui Tang To: , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH] clk: microchip: check for null return of devm_kzalloc() Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:48:58 +0800 Message-ID: <20221119054858.178629-1-tanghui20@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.67.175.30] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemm600005.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.191) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Because of the possilble failure of devm_kzalloc(), name might be NULL and will cause null pointer derefrence later. Therefore, it might be better to check it and directly return -ENOMEM. Fixes: d39fb172760e ("clk: microchip: add PolarFire SoC fabric clock support") Signed-off-by: Hui Tang --- drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c index 7be028dced63..32aae880a14f 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c +++ b/drivers/clk/microchip/clk-mpfs-ccc.c @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_outputs(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_out_hw_ struct mpfs_ccc_out_hw_clock *out_hw = &out_hws[i]; char *name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 23, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!name) + return -ENOMEM; + snprintf(name, 23, "%s_out%u", parent->name, i); out_hw->divider.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_HW(name, &parent->hw, &clk_divider_ops, 0); out_hw->divider.reg = data->pll_base[i / MPFS_CCC_OUTPUTS_PER_PLL] + @@ -200,6 +203,9 @@ static int mpfs_ccc_register_plls(struct device *dev, struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clo struct mpfs_ccc_pll_hw_clock *pll_hw = &pll_hws[i]; char *name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 18, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!name) + return -ENOMEM; + pll_hw->base = data->pll_base[i]; snprintf(name, 18, "ccc%s_pll%u", strchrnul(dev->of_node->full_name, '@'), i); pll_hw->name = (const char *)name; -- 2.17.1