From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F811C433FE for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231754AbiKUQBW (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:01:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33912 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231812AbiKUQBT (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:01:19 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65FFD2881 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:01:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1669046478; x=1700582478; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pLe/ct9SeJ901K1pmaY7qOYT9Jr+za1iO1Vv3IlDQlw=; b=XP1YJSfA7T1pMFn537cqyycHKN1HutXrcprs1Uv4w1ZrCm1fgg4eAcTB D7GSUd13vxMw1vLoR9yNRsWivYeAjqfyxW2JjNLWWZpGV7nOjylBBKl/F CBDuL1Egoh/NGGpvLQSgI62cII7DeOTol5TYx/nZ7l1dckaqA4VQtaPbe jgNnQuEOeVhlGn+rKNz/0irOikqNA/XJ3+PK3U1yfEg96eKOTeGabzJtN SUL4LeP9/Hs0JZIGOvREp7p90cDO8aIoXnb4vmyQhTBSXs8wSGrrKhL80 c/BmH2Kugjrlz/6QZK42tiALPo0LxTTxuvjtxKqJ6ofxCWrx3J+JYblEz A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10538"; a="377851207" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,181,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="377851207" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2022 08:00:46 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10538"; a="815756351" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,181,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="815756351" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([10.43.11.63]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2022 08:00:43 -0800 Received: from newjersey.igk.intel.com (newjersey.igk.intel.com [10.102.20.203]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id 2ALG0fJh014870; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:00:42 GMT From: Alexander Lobakin To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Alexander Lobakin , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Jiri Slaby , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Tony Luck , Kees Cook , Masahiro Yamada , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/boot: fix relying on link order Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:00:30 +0100 Message-Id: <20221121160030.395096-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: References: <20221101161529.1634188-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> <20221107125528.543764-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> <2993a60c-edaa-a29a-2644-3ee86c622847@intel.com> <20221121120918.388035-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Borislav Petkov Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:14:43 +0100 > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 01:09:18PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > > Things are a bit busy in the review queue at the moment. As always, > > > we'd love help reviewing stuff. So, while you're waiting for us to > > > review this, could you perhaps look around and find a series that's also > > > hurting for review tags? > > > > I've got Reviewed-by and Tested-by from Jiri, isn't that enough? Or > > I need also some other group to get tags from? > > What he actually means is if *you* yourself help out with patch review. > Like find a set on lkml which you're interested in - I believe there > will be no shortage of such sets - and poke at it, review it, ask > devil's advocate questions, etc. > > The distribution of work - gazillion submitters vs a handful of > maintainers simply cannot scale and instead of submitters pinging > maintainers all the time when they can look at their set, submitters > could review other submitters' work in the meantime, while waiting. > > I.e., a win-win-win situation. :-) > > Makes more sense? I know, I got it from the first read :D I try to review stuff I have mature knowledge in each day, not that lots of them are from the x86 ML :s > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette Thanks, Olek