mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] workqueue: Make too_many_workers() return the worker excess
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:29:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221122192937.2386494-4-vschneid@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221122192937.2386494-1-vschneid@redhat.com>

Later patches will need the logic implemented within too_many_workers() to
get the amount of workers to delete. Rather than duplicate the logic,
rework too_many_workers() to return the count of workers to delete - its
return value can be used as a boolean value, so no change in behaviour
intended.

The function currently returns true when
  (nr_idle - 2) * MAX_IDLE_WORKERS_RATIO >= nr_busy
thus, the desired number of idle workers is expressed by
  (nr_idle - 2) * MAX_IDLE_WORKERS_RATIO == nr_busy - 1
IOW
   nr_idle == ((nr_busy - 1) / MAX_IDLE_WORKERS_RATIO) + 2

MAX_IDLE_WORKERS_RATIO being a compile-time power of 2, we can leave that
as a division.

While at it, rename too_many_workers() to worker_cull_count().

Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 8185a42848c50..4fc8085f3fe17 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -816,14 +816,20 @@ static bool need_to_create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	return need_more_worker(pool) && !may_start_working(pool);
 }
 
-/* Do we have too many workers and should some go away? */
-static bool too_many_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
+/* How many idle workers should we get rid of, if any? */
+static unsigned int worker_cull_count(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
 	bool managing = pool->flags & POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE;
 	int nr_idle = pool->nr_idle + managing; /* manager is considered idle */
 	int nr_busy = pool->nr_workers - nr_idle;
 
-	return nr_idle > 2 && (nr_idle - 2) * MAX_IDLE_WORKERS_RATIO >= nr_busy;
+	lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * We keep at least 2 spare idle workers, but overall aim to keep at
+	 * most (1 / MAX_IDLE_WORKERS_RATIO) workers idle.
+	 */
+	return max(0, nr_idle - 2 - ((nr_busy - 1) / MAX_IDLE_WORKERS_RATIO));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1806,7 +1812,7 @@ static void worker_enter_idle(struct worker *worker)
 	/* idle_list is LIFO */
 	list_add(&worker->entry, &pool->idle_list);
 
-	if (too_many_workers(pool) && !timer_pending(&pool->idle_timer))
+	if (worker_cull_count(pool) && !timer_pending(&pool->idle_timer))
 		mod_timer(&pool->idle_timer, jiffies + IDLE_WORKER_TIMEOUT);
 
 	/* Sanity check nr_running. */
@@ -2025,7 +2031,7 @@ static void idle_worker_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
-	while (too_many_workers(pool)) {
+	while (worker_cull_count(pool)) {
 		struct worker *worker;
 		unsigned long expires;
 
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-22 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-22 19:29 [PATCH v5 0/5] workqueue: destroy_worker() vs isolated CPUs Valentin Schneider
2022-11-22 19:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] workqueue: Protects wq_unbound_cpumask with wq_pool_attach_mutex Valentin Schneider
2022-11-22 19:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] workqueue: Factorize unbind/rebind_workers() logic Valentin Schneider
2022-11-22 19:29 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2022-11-22 20:17   ` [PATCH v5 3/5] workqueue: Make too_many_workers() return the worker excess Tejun Heo
2022-11-28 11:24     ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-22 19:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] workqueue: Convert the idle_timer to a timer + work_struct Valentin Schneider
2022-11-22 20:23   ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-28 11:24     ` Valentin Schneider
2022-11-22 19:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] workqueue: Unbind kworkers before sending them to exit() Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221122192937.2386494-4-vschneid@redhat.com \
    --to=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®