From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
To: <tj@kernel.org>, <josef@toxicpanda.com>, <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <shikemeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] blk-throttle: remove unnecessary check for validation of limit index
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:03:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221123060401.20392-10-shikemeng@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221123060401.20392-1-shikemeng@huawei.com>
We always keep limit index valid as following:
Max limit is always valid and low limit can only be invalidated in
blk_throtl_update_limit_valid. Each time low limit may become invalid
after blk_throtl_update_limit_valid is called, we will check and make
sure current limit index is valid.
It's reasonable to always keep limit index valid, so we can remove this
check.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
---
block/blk-throttle.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index 3eccc7af4368..6f509cadd92b 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -418,12 +418,10 @@ static void tg_update_has_rules(struct throtl_grp *tg)
for (rw = READ; rw <= WRITE; rw++) {
tg->has_rules_iops[rw] =
(parent_tg && parent_tg->has_rules_iops[rw]) ||
- (td->limit_valid[td->limit_index] &&
- tg_iops_limit(tg, rw) != UINT_MAX);
+ (tg_iops_limit(tg, rw) != UINT_MAX);
tg->has_rules_bps[rw] =
(parent_tg && parent_tg->has_rules_bps[rw]) ||
- (td->limit_valid[td->limit_index] &&
- (tg_bps_limit(tg, rw) != U64_MAX));
+ (tg_bps_limit(tg, rw) != U64_MAX);
}
}
--
2.30.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-23 6:03 [PATCH 00/11] A few bugfix and cleanup patches for blk-throttle Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 6:03 ` [PATCH 01/11] blk-throttle: Limit whole system if root group is configured when on the default hierarchy Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-24 11:47 ` Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 6:03 ` [PATCH 02/11] blk-throttle: Fix that bps of child could exceed bps limited in parent Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:09 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-24 11:49 ` Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 6:03 ` [PATCH 03/11] blk-throttle: ignore cgroup without io queued in blk_throtl_cancel_bios Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:13 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-23 6:03 ` [PATCH 04/11] blk-throttle: correct calculation of wait time in tg_may_dispatch Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:18 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-24 12:10 ` Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 6:03 ` [PATCH 05/11] blk-throttle: simpfy low limit reached check in throtl_tg_can_upgrade Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:26 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-24 12:52 ` Kemeng Shi
2022-11-26 5:03 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-23 6:03 ` [PATCH 06/11] blk-throttle: fix typo in comment of throtl_adjusted_limit Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:26 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-23 6:03 ` [PATCH 07/11] blk-throttle: remove incorrect comment for tg_last_low_overflow_time Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-23 6:03 ` [PATCH 08/11] blk-throttle: remove repeat check of elapsed time from last upgrade in throtl_hierarchy_can_downgrade Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:28 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-24 12:58 ` Kemeng Shi
2022-11-26 8:15 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-23 6:03 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2022-11-23 18:31 ` [PATCH 09/11] blk-throttle: remove unnecessary check for validation of limit index Tejun Heo
2022-11-24 12:58 ` Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 6:04 ` [PATCH 10/11] blk-throttle: remove unused variable td in tg_update_has_rules Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-23 6:04 ` [PATCH 11/11] blk-throttle: Use more siutable time_after check for update slice_start Kemeng Shi
2022-11-23 18:29 ` Tejun Heo
2022-11-24 13:02 ` Kemeng Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221123060401.20392-10-shikemeng@huawei.com \
--to=shikemeng@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®