From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: <vkoul@kernel.org>, <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
<pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>, <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: bus_type: Avoid lockdep assert in sdw_drv_probe()
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:35:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221123093547.GC105268@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121162453.1834170-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:24:52PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> Don't hold sdw_dev_lock while calling the peripheral driver
> probe() and remove() callbacks.
>
> Holding sdw_dev_lock around the probe() and remove() calls
> causes a theoretical mutex inversion which lockdep will
> assert on. The peripheral driver probe will probably register
> a soundcard, which will take ALSA and ASoC locks. During
> normal operation a runtime resume suspend can be triggered
> while these locks are held and will then take sdw_dev_lock.
>
> It's not necessary to hold sdw_dev_lock when calling the
> probe() and remove(), it is only used to prevent the bus core
> calling the driver callbacks if there isn't a driver or the
> driver is removing.
>
> If sdw_dev_lock is held while setting and clearing the
> 'probed' flag this is sufficient to guarantee the safety of
> callback functions.
>
> The potential race of a bus event happening while probe() is
> executing is the same as the existing race of the bus event
> handler taking the mutex first and processing the event
> before probe() can run. In both cases the event has already
> happened before the driver is probed and ready to accept
> callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Thanks,
Charles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-23 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 16:24 Richard Fitzgerald
2022-11-23 9:35 ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2022-11-28 17:18 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-11-29 10:47 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-11-29 15:44 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-12-01 14:32 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2022-12-01 16:55 ` Richard Fitzgerald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221123093547.GC105268@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com \
--to=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®