From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E690C43219 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 19:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229581AbiKXT21 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:28:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39670 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229471AbiKXT2Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:28:25 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0FE325C73 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:28:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4454862229 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 19:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02D50C433D6; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 19:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:28:19 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 05/11] tracing/osnoise: Add osnoise/options file Message-ID: <20221124142819.44aeaed2@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <8cc1c8a0-7d2c-e653-2ab9-40d040eebbb3@kernel.org> References: <20221124145019.782980678@goodmis.org> <20221124145046.156919074@goodmis.org> <8cc1c8a0-7d2c-e653-2ab9-40d040eebbb3@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:31:22 +0100 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > Hi Steve, Hi Daniel, > > Yesterday I sent a v2 of this patch series, adding some more options [1]. Heh, it came in the window of me triaging my patch queue and running my tests. > > But as you already queued these, and as there is no real difference from the > v1 and v2 in these code patches, I think the best way is for me to send a v3 > with the additional patches, build on top of the ftrace/core. > > (Is it a bad idea? let me know :-)) Just send patches on top, as these already went through testing, and I don't want to rebase the branch. Thanks! -- Steve