mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sstabellini@kernel.org" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: objtool warning for next-20221118
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:39:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221124163928.dof5ldfer6rswlnx@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68dc479a-6b61-0012-888d-c1b4cc513cdb@suse.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:47:47AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
> > > @@ -385,17 +385,9 @@ static void xen_pv_play_dead(void) /* used only
> > > with HOTPLUG_CPU */
> > >   {
> > >       play_dead_common();
> > >       HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_down, xen_vcpu_nr(smp_processor_id()), NULL);
> > > -    cpu_bringup();
> > > -    /*
> > > -     * commit 4b0c0f294 (tick: Cleanup NOHZ per cpu data on cpu down)
> > > -     * clears certain data that the cpu_idle loop (which called us
> > > -     * and that we return from) expects. The only way to get that
> > > -     * data back is to call:
> > > -     */
> > > -    tick_nohz_idle_enter();
> > > -    tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick_protected();
> > > -    cpuhp_online_idle(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE);
> > > +    /* FIXME: converge cpu_bringup_and_idle() and start_secondary() */
> > > +    cpu_bringup_and_idle();
> > 
> > I think this will leak stack memory. Multiple cpu offline/online cycles of
> > the same cpu will finally exhaust the idle stack.

Doh!  Of course...

I was actually thinking ahead, to where eventually xen_pv_play_dead()
can call start_cpu0(), which can be changed to automatically reset the
stack pointer like this:

SYM_CODE_START(start_cpu0)
	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
	UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
	movq	PER_CPU_VAR(pcpu_hot + X86_top_of_stack), %rax
	leaq	-PTREGS_SIZE(%rax), %rsp
	jmp	.Ljump_to_C_code
SYM_CODE_END(start_cpu0)

but that would only be possible be after more cleanups which converge
cpu_bringup_and_idle() with start_secondary().

> The attached patch seems to work fine.

The patch looks good to me.

It doesn't solve Paul's original issue where arch_cpu_idle_dead() needs
to be __noreturn.  But that should probably be a separate patch anyway.

> The __noreturn annotation seems to trigger an objtool warning, though, in
> spite of the added BUG() at the end of xen_pv_play_dead():
>
> arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.o: warning: objtool: xen_pv_play_dead() falls through to
> next function xen_pv_cpu_die()

You'll need to tell objtool that xen_cpu_bringup_again() is noreturn by
adding "xen_cpu_bringup_again" to global_noreturns[] in
tools/objtool/check.c.

(Yes it's a pain, I'll be working an improved solution to the noreturn
thing...)

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-24 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21  4:07 Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-21 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-21 14:52   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-22  5:16     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-22  8:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-23  0:22         ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-23  1:48           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-23 17:49             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-23 18:19               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-23 19:12                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-23 22:32                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-23 23:06                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-28 19:06                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-01  0:02                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-01  0:33                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-01  4:21                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-23  1:23         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-23  8:55           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-23 10:52             ` Andrew Cooper
2022-11-23 17:03               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-24  2:39                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-11-24  5:28                   ` Juergen Gross
2022-11-24  7:47                     ` Juergen Gross
2022-11-24 16:39                       ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2022-11-25  5:30                         ` Juergen Gross
2022-11-29 19:56                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-12-02  0:27                             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221124163928.dof5ldfer6rswlnx@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®