From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86-kernel <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
alison.schofield@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com
Subject: [Patch V1 3/7] x86/microcode/core: Move microcode_check() to cpu/microcode/core.c
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:08:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221129210832.107850-4-ashok.raj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129210832.107850-1-ashok.raj@intel.com>
microcode_check() is only called from microcode/core.c. Move it and make
it static to prepare for upcoming fix of false negative when checking CPU
features after a microcode update. Also move get_cpu_cap() to processor.h
for general use outside of kernel/cpu.h
No functional change.
Suggested-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
---
Tony
Add movement of get_cpu_cap() to commit log
Reinette
Avoid including ../cpu.h and move to more general header.
Alison
Split patch to just move the function before use inside microcode
files.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 +--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h | 1 -
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 32 ----------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 67c9d73b31fa..f5380806f3fa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ extern const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op;
#define cache_line_size() (boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_alignment)
+extern void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
extern void cpu_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
-
static inline unsigned long long l1tf_pfn_limit(void)
{
return BIT_ULL(boot_cpu_data.x86_cache_bits - 1 - PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -835,7 +835,6 @@ bool xen_set_default_idle(void);
#endif
void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dummy);
-void microcode_check(void);
enum l1tf_mitigations {
L1TF_MITIGATION_OFF,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
index 7c9b5893c30a..a142b8d543a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.h
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ static inline void tsx_ap_init(void) { }
extern void init_spectral_chicken(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
-extern void get_cpu_cap(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
extern void get_cpu_address_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
extern void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
extern void init_scattered_cpuid_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 3e508f239098..bbd362ead043 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -2305,38 +2305,6 @@ void cpu_init_secondary(void)
}
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING
-/*
- * The microcode loader calls this upon late microcode load to recheck features,
- * only when microcode has been updated. Caller holds microcode_mutex and CPU
- * hotplug lock.
- */
-void microcode_check(void)
-{
- struct cpuinfo_x86 info;
-
- perf_check_microcode();
-
- /* Reload CPUID max function as it might've changed. */
- info.cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0);
-
- /*
- * Copy all capability leafs to pick up the synthetic ones so that
- * memcmp() below doesn't fail on that. The ones coming from CPUID will
- * get overwritten in get_cpu_cap().
- */
- memcpy(&info.x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability, sizeof(info.x86_capability));
-
- get_cpu_cap(&info);
-
- if (!memcmp(&info.x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability, sizeof(info.x86_capability)))
- return;
-
- pr_warn("x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect.\n");
- pr_warn("x86/CPU: Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.\n");
-}
-#endif
-
/*
* Invoked from core CPU hotplug code after hotplug operations
*/
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
index 712aafff96e0..ef24e1d228d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -431,6 +431,37 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info)
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * The microcode loader calls this upon late microcode load to recheck features,
+ * only when microcode has been updated. Caller holds microcode_mutex and CPU
+ * hotplug lock.
+ */
+static void microcode_check(void)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 info;
+
+ perf_check_microcode();
+
+ /* Reload CPUID max function as it might've changed. */
+ info.cpuid_level = cpuid_eax(0);
+
+ /*
+ * Copy all capability leafs to pick up the synthetic ones so that
+ * memcmp() below doesn't fail on that. The ones coming from CPUID will
+ * get overwritten in get_cpu_cap().
+ */
+ memcpy(&info.x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability, sizeof(info.x86_capability));
+
+ get_cpu_cap(&info);
+
+ if (!memcmp(&info.x86_capability, &boot_cpu_data.x86_capability,
+ sizeof(info.x86_capability)))
+ return;
+
+ pr_warn("x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect.\n");
+ pr_warn("x86/CPU: Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.\n");
+}
+
/*
* Reload microcode late on all CPUs. Wait for a sec until they
* all gather together.
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 21:08 [Patch V1 0/7] x86/microcode: Some cleanups and fixes for microcode Ashok Raj
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 1/7] x86/microcode/intel: Remove redundant microcode rev pr_info()s Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 18:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-03 0:26 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-03 13:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 2/7] x86/microcode/intel: Remove retries on early microcode load Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-03 1:48 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 23:53 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-12-03 1:47 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-05 12:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-05 16:42 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-05 20:53 ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Do not retry microcode reloading on the APs tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2022-11-29 21:08 ` Ashok Raj [this message]
2022-12-02 19:02 ` [Patch V1 3/7] x86/microcode/core: Move microcode_check() to cpu/microcode/core.c Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-02 20:57 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-12-03 0:21 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-05 16:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-05 21:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 4/7] x86/microcode/core: Take a snapshot before and after applying microcode Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-03 1:57 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-07 20:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-08 0:05 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 5/7] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare the print_ucode_rev to simply take a rev to print Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 6/7] x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new rev during early boot Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 7/7] x86/microcode/intel: Print when early microcode loading fails Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-05 18:19 ` Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221129210832.107850-4-ashok.raj@intel.com \
--to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®