From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE34C10F1E for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 03:50:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229954AbiLIDuJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2022 22:50:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33326 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229943AbiLIDuG (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2022 22:50:06 -0500 Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.16]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0B7B2EEE; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 19:50:01 -0800 (PST) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3F510098B; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 03:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a263.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D72EB100BF8; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 03:49:59 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1670557799; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Mb2OI5TVpI7DEpWH65YWvc37jO47RfLUOUkUSBnpAreSRf1jU8VBXGGAnzFTiISbZD2C45 ZbeMbB4LuDaDXRF9OwialdTYbcqttP9/56O2vW7aslT1vmarQTWPfZsckZc7uHrLt6b4PC cTiHfXU6/zbQIfC83c/1yk4jTS+UGR+sLvFBs3czhLQmYV7GQjJKZSWXP0fCYBdSHcyNuq AtgVMEIrY80BtzNwPFbMjPDEiasqKxaBadzuqzq4+AZzw42xLVzC/ezEsbbsoUscGIBrf6 zoJ2W7OkjXWYMlgM5rU+TVnk24Xinq7lmxbUHWYpXHDrSAM8x84vlv9chm0klA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1670557799; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=cbxtvkRhRL+tnV05JpD/zco8wP6mLe11Sn32Cdb8ZVU=; b=Rv3EoD80Vn5KXdm7d44p43iipwk0lIz/klsi+SaG8mlhkCOCex8cXcvjUpen8DOaiox/UN BKOGxfmHdTbokNXhn5jek6SD6Vk01kX1gCpGaSVi2qJtRGp6olArx0hKPRiJSQSnv/r7RS OfMKC/IoNWPABmQ6KrM56UHYY/t/FnxY2c3QLXMV7GHTtvPDSbp5dSZn4casrl1Kfzd+LL zLjQLEzHi2yurZS0or2M5hEYDa3UX/uwby1vOMqLUq5tbzlwL2jTDwJR3/2+1Qlyod/Cgg eDsf29GwFJ2VkwaAS3a/i53WSWYeI9b60VEdQ495CSICBGYmS9k6C+MqrvsndA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-d48c5ddb-hdvm5; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=dave@stgolabs.net X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|dave@stgolabs.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Shelf-Arithmetic: 454c2ce13f103b60_1670557800156_2839342034 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1670557800156:299660159 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1670557800155 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a263.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.103.24.106 (trex/6.7.1); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 03:50:00 +0000 Received: from offworld (ip72-199-50-187.sd.sd.cox.net [72.199.50.187]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dave@stgolabs.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a263.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4NSxqW1chrzHF; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 19:49:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stgolabs.net; s=dreamhost; t=1670557799; bh=cbxtvkRhRL+tnV05JpD/zco8wP6mLe11Sn32Cdb8ZVU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Content-Type; b=HB2X6gxfOPJsQfZlIxlp1gJZbBKdLCHJINv05QwGmzgYbKyhgirnvPkMUE8P8C64M ScwWRjekpkywV6FsOFjwnH7T2Cd7riP/Yr04fT8TGY2K4mToRVXJWWVOfFLy/WC6X7 v+UEXKe1VQExN2FDNti9B1AvlMGuhG89spNbkKRt0rRv0DwPdUmFmDcOP3Cte+Eq5U /fuVa1irEiGna//TGNbKyHr+YV4dkm+8kcptfbqYmBhcIjcyFBW7r+0SPtEuiZvg9T ahk0FRbjKRU9gQeg9Gbn96kEvG5VAWVXz2QV5014x4pndWSBqmyh+7yjj+X/EOE6eS vohzBXzCQ8jNA== Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 19:25:50 -0800 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett , "Paul E. McKenney" , rcu@vger.kernel.org, connoro@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] locktorture: Allow non-rtmutex lock types to be boosted Message-ID: <20221209032550.p4tcyypgkuspp2ur@offworld> References: <20221209022305.321149-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221209022305.321149-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20220429 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 09 Dec 2022, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote: >Currently RT boosting is only done for rtmutex_lock, however with proxy >execution, we also have the mutex_lock participating in priorities. To >exercise the testing better, add RT boosting to other lock testing types >as well, using a new knob (rt_boost). No particular objection to the patches, but shouldn't these go as part of the next iteration of the PE series? Thanks, Davidlohr