From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: 1vier1@web.de, Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
"Sun, Jiebin" <jiebin.sun@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] include/linux/percpu_counter.h: Race in uniprocessor percpu_counter_add()
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:04:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221216150441.200533-2-manfred@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221216150441.200533-1-manfred@colorfullife.com>
The percpu interface is supposed to be preempt and irq safe.
But:
The uniprocessor implementation of percpu_counter_add() is not irq safe:
if an interrupt happens during the +=, then the result is undefined.
Therefore: switch from preempt_disable() to local_irq_save().
This prevents interrupts from interrupting the +=, and as a side effect
prevents preemption.
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: "Sun, Jiebin" <jiebin.sun@intel.com>
---
include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
index a3aae8d57a42..521a733e21a9 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -152,9 +152,11 @@ __percpu_counter_compare(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 rhs, s32 batch)
static inline void
percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{
- preempt_disable();
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
fbc->count += amount;
- preempt_enable();
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/* non-SMP percpu_counter_add_local is the same with percpu_counter_add */
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-16 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-16 15:01 [PATCH 0/3] various irq handling fixes/docu updates Manfred Spraul
2022-12-16 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] :lib/percpu_counter: percpu_counter_add_batch() overflow/underflow Manfred Spraul
2022-12-16 15:04 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2022-12-16 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] kernel/irq/manage.c: disable_irq() might sleep Manfred Spraul
2022-12-20 6:58 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2022-12-23 10:54 ` Manfred Spraul
2022-12-23 11:22 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2022-12-24 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2023-01-11 18:38 ` [tip: irq/core] genirq: Add might_sleep() to disable_irq() tip-bot2 for Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221216150441.200533-2-manfred@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=1vier1@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jiebin.sun@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®