mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Pratyush Yadav" <ptyadav@amazon.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>, "Paul Durrant" <paul@xen.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>,
	"Puranjay Mohan" <pjy@amazon.de>,
	"Maximilian Heyne" <mheyne@amazon.de>,
	"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.4] xen-netback: move removal of "hotplug-status" to the right place
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 16:37:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221219153710.23782-1-ptyadav@amazon.de> (raw)

The removal of "hotplug-status" has moved around a bit. First it was
moved from netback_remove() to hotplug_status_changed() in upstream
commit 1f2565780e9b ("xen-netback: remove 'hotplug-status' once it has
served its purpose"). Then the change was reverted in upstream commit
0f4558ae9187 ("Revert "xen-netback: remove 'hotplug-status' once it has
served its purpose""), but it moved the removal to backend_disconnect().
Then the upstream commit c55f34b6aec2 ("xen-netback: only remove
'hotplug-status' when the vif is actually destroyed") moved it finally
back to netback_remove(). The thing to note being it is removed
unconditionally this time around.

The story on v5.4.y adds to this confusion. Commit 60e4e3198ce8 ("Revert
"xen-netback: remove 'hotplug-status' once it has served its purpose"")
is backported to v5.4.y but the original commit that it tries to revert
was never present on 5.4. So the backport incorrectly ends up just
adding another xenbus_rm() of "hotplug-status" in backend_disconnect().

Now in v5.4.y it is removed in both backend_disconnect() and
netback_remove(). But it should only be removed in netback_remove(), as
the upstream version does.

Removing "hotplug-status" in backend_disconnect() causes problems when
the frontend unilaterally disconnects, as explained in
c55f34b6aec2 ("xen-netback: only remove 'hotplug-status' when the vif is
actually destroyed").

Remove "hotplug-status" in the same place as it is done on the upstream
version to ensure unilateral re-connection of frontend continues to
work.

Fixes: 60e4e3198ce8 ("Revert "xen-netback: remove 'hotplug-status' once it has served its purpose"")
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
---
 drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
index 44e353dd2ba1..43bd881ab3dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c
@@ -202,10 +202,10 @@ static int netback_remove(struct xenbus_device *dev)
 	set_backend_state(be, XenbusStateClosed);

 	unregister_hotplug_status_watch(be);
+	xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename, "hotplug-status");
 	if (be->vif) {
 		kobject_uevent(&dev->dev.kobj, KOBJ_OFFLINE);
 		xen_unregister_watchers(be->vif);
-		xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, dev->nodename, "hotplug-status");
 		xenvif_free(be->vif);
 		be->vif = NULL;
 	}
@@ -435,7 +435,6 @@ static void backend_disconnect(struct backend_info *be)
 		unsigned int queue_index;

 		xen_unregister_watchers(vif);
-		xenbus_rm(XBT_NIL, be->dev->nodename, "hotplug-status");
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 		xenvif_debugfs_delif(vif);
 #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
--
2.38.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-19 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-19 15:37 Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2022-12-19 15:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221219153710.23782-1-ptyadav@amazon.de \
    --to=ptyadav@amazon.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=mheyne@amazon.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=pjy@amazon.de \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®